Foreword: Comparison and consensus of classifications
作者： William H. E. Day
DOI: 10.1007/BF01894187
关键词:
摘要:
springer.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(17)
Scott A. Boorman, Donald C. Olivier, Metrics on spaces of finite trees Journal of Mathematical Psychology. ,vol. 10, pp. 26- 59 ,(1973) , 10.1016/0022-2496(73)90003-5
R. R. Sokal, F. J. Rohlf, Taxonomic Congruence in the Leptopodomorpha Re-examined Systematic Biology. ,vol. 30, pp. 309- 325 ,(1981) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/30.3.309
F.R. McMorris, Dean Neumann, Consensus functions defined on trees Mathematical Social Sciences. ,vol. 4, pp. 131- 136 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0165-4896(83)90099-9
R. T. Schuh, J. S. Farris, Methods for investigating taxonomic congruence and their application to the Leptopodomorpha Systematic Biology. ,vol. 30, pp. 331- 351 ,(1981) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/30.3.331
D.A. Neumann, Faithful consensus methods for n-trees Mathematical Biosciences. ,vol. 63, pp. 271- 287 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0025-5564(82)90043-8
William H.E. Day, The role of complexity in comparing classifications Mathematical Biosciences. ,vol. 66, pp. 97- 114 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0025-5564(83)90080-9
D. H. Colless, Congruence Between Morphometric and Allozyme Data for Menidia Species: A Reappraisal Systematic Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 288- 299 ,(1980) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/29.3.288
R STINEBRICKNER, s-Consensus trees and indices Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. ,vol. 46, pp. 923- 935 ,(1984) , 10.1016/S0092-8240(84)80011-7
G. Nelson, Cladistic Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions, with a Historical Note on Adanson's Familles Des Plantes (1763–1764) Systematic Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 1- 21 ,(1979) , 10.1093/SYSBIO/28.1.1
F. James Rohlf, Consensus indices for comparing classifications Mathematical Biosciences. ,vol. 59, pp. 131- 144 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0025-5564(82)90112-2