Current evidence on the unit equivalence of different botulinum neurotoxin A formulations and recommendations for clinical practice in dermatology.

作者: SYRUS KARSAI , CHRISTIAN RAULIN

DOI: 10.1111/J.1524-4725.2008.34375.X

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND The unit equivalence between the two main Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNTA) preparations, Dysport (Ipsen Ltd., Slough, Berkshire, UK) and BOTOX (Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA), is a matter of discussion. UK assay used to test more sensitive than U.S. for BOTOX, resulting in different efficacy per both formulations. Ratios ranging from 6:1 1:1 can be found literature, but recently published literature suggests that 1 equivalent approximately 2 4 units (ratio 2:1-4:1). OBJECTIVE Because number BoNTA treatments constantly increasing, these differences warrant systematic review evidence about METHODS based on detailed research all relevant databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, specialist textbooks). RESULTS present supports recent assumption dose ratios less 3:1 (e.g., 2.5:1 or even 2:1) are probably suitable. CONCLUSIONS current still insufficient, further investigation lower recommended.

参考文章(45)
Berthold Rzany, Hendrik Zielke, Overview of Botulinum Toxin Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 1- 9 ,(2007) , 10.1007/978-3-540-34095-9_1
McCormack Mp, Medico-legal reports. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. ,vol. 86, pp. 493- 493 ,(1993)
E J Schantz, E A Johnson, Properties and use of botulinum toxin and other microbial neurotoxins in medicine. Microbiological Research. ,vol. 56, pp. 80- 99 ,(1992) , 10.1128/MR.56.1.80-99.1992
W Poewe, Respective potencies of Botox and Dysport: a double blind, randomised, crossover study in cervical dystonia Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 72, pp. 430- 430 ,(2002) , 10.1136/JNNP.72.4.430
A M Pickett, P Hambleton, Potency equivalence of botulinum toxin preparations. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. ,vol. 87, pp. 719- 719 ,(1994)
H. Bigalke, Botulinumtoxine: Wirksamkeit und Antigenität Klinische Neurophysiologie. ,vol. 32, pp. 210- 212 ,(2001) , 10.1055/S-2001-18954
J.Alastair Carruthers, Nicholas J. Lowe, M.Alan Menter, John Gibson, Marian Nordquist, Julie Mordaunt, Patricia Walker, Nina Eadie, A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 46, pp. 840- 849 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MJD.2002.121356
Philippa Lowe, Rickie Patnaik, Nicholas Lowe, Comparison of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar lines: A double-blind, randomized study Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 55, pp. 975- 980 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JAAD.2006.07.006
ADA R. TRINDADE DE ALMEIDA, ELISA MARQUES, JANETE DE ALMEIDA, THAIS CUNHA, ROSANA BORASO, Pilot study comparing the diffusion of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A in patients with forehead hyperhidrosis. Dermatologic Surgery. ,vol. 33, ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1524-4725.2006.32330.X
John Elston, John Lee, CLINICAL USE OF BOTULEMUM TOXIN The Lancet. ,vol. 332, pp. 1139- 1139 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90554-5