Deciphering genetic mate choice: Not so simple in group‐housed conservation breeding programs

作者: Katherine A. Farquharson , Carolyn J. Hogg , Katherine Belov , Catherine E. Grueber

DOI: 10.1111/EVA.12981

关键词:

摘要: Incorporating mate choice into conservation breeding programs can improve reproduction and the retention of natural behaviors. However, different types genetic-based have varied consequences for genetic diversity management. As a result, it is important to examine mechanisms in captivity assess its costs benefits. Most research this area has focused on experimental pairing trials; however, resource-intensive approach not always feasible captive settings interfere with other management constraints. We used generalized linear mixed models permutation approaches investigate overall success group-housed Tasmanian devils at three nonmutually exclusive hypotheses: (a) advantage heterozygous individuals, (b) dissimilar mates, (c) optimum distance, using both 1,948 genome-wide SNPs 12 MHC-linked microsatellites. The managed devil insurance population largest such program Australia known high variance reproductive success. found that nongenetic factors as age were best predictors competitive scenario, younger females older males being more successful. no evidence under hypotheses tested. Mate varies among species across environments, so we advocate studies realistic contexts or wild may apply. Conservation managers must weigh up need wait adequate sample sizes detect risk changes occur during time captivity. Our study shows examining integrating housed realistic, semi-natural group-based be difficult than previously considered.

参考文章(50)
Suhel Quader, Mate choice and its implications for conservation and management Current Science. ,vol. 89, pp. 1220- 1229 ,(2005)
L.A. FORSBERG, J. DANNEWITZ, E. PETERSSON, M. GRAHN, Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 20, pp. 1859- 1869 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2007.01380.X
C. E. GRUEBER, S. NAKAGAWA, R. J. LAWS, I. G. JAMIESON, Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 699- 711 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2010.02210.X
Bart Kempenaers, Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory Advances in The Study of Behavior. ,vol. 37, pp. 189- 278 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37005-8
Marta Szulkin, Nicolas Bierne, Patrice David, HETEROZYGOSITY-FITNESS CORRELATIONS: A TIME FOR REAPPRAISAL Evolution. ,vol. 64, pp. 1202- 1217 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2010.00966.X
Rémi Chargé, Céline Teplitsky, Gabriele Sorci, Matthew Low, Can sexual selection theory inform genetic management of captive populations? A review Evolutionary Applications. ,vol. 7, pp. 1120- 1133 ,(2014) , 10.1111/EVA.12229
Philip W. Hedrick, What is the evidence for heterozygote advantage selection? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. ,vol. 27, pp. 698- 704 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2012.08.012
Marissa L. Parrott, Simon J. Ward, Peter D. Temple-Smith, Lynne Selwood, Females Choose Mates Based on Genetic Relatedness in a Small Dasyurid Marsupial, the Agile Antechinus (Antechinus agilis) PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0122381- ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0122381
T. Kamiya, K. O'Dwyer, H. Westerdahl, A. Senior, S. Nakagawa, A quantitative review of MHC-based mating preference: the role of diversity and dissimilarity. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 5151- 5163 ,(2014) , 10.1111/MEC.12934
Shinichi Nakagawa, Holger Schielzeth, A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 4, pp. 133- 142 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2012.00261.X