Some more thoughts on semantic oughts: A reply to Daniel Whiting

作者: A. Hattiangadi

DOI: 10.1093/ANALYS/ANN009

关键词:

摘要:

参考文章(6)
I. L. Humberstone, Two sorts of ‘ought’s Analysis. ,vol. 32, pp. 8- 11 ,(1971) , 10.1093/ANALYS/32.1.8
Paul A. Boghossian, The normativity of content Philosophical Issues. ,vol. 13, pp. 31- 45 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1533-6077.00003
Paul Boghossian, Is Meaning Normative Mind & Language. ,vol. 21, pp. 220- 240 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.0268-1064.2006.00312.X
Daniel Whiting, The normativity of meaning defended Analysis. ,vol. 67, pp. 133- 140 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-8284.2007.00663.X
Krister Bykvist, Anandi Hattiangadi, Does thought imply ought? Analysis. ,vol. 67, pp. 277- 285 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-8284.2007.00691.X