Replicating participatory devices: the consensus conference confronts nanotechnology

作者: Brice Laurent

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Describes two examples (in France and in the US) of replication Danish procedure consensus conference for public participation nanotechnology, argues that emphasis on evaluation participatory should not be made at expense richer analysis problematisation fostered by such policy instruments.

参考文章(20)
Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox ,(2000)
Javier Lezaun, A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups The Sociological Review. ,vol. 55, pp. 130- 151 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-954X.2007.00733.X
Patrick W. Hamlett, Technology Theory and Deliberative Democracy Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 28, pp. 112- 140 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0162243902238498
Sherry R. Arnstein, A Ladder of Citizen Participation Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 35, pp. 216- 224 ,(1969) , 10.1080/01944366908977225
Michael D. Cobb, Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology Science Communication. ,vol. 27, pp. 221- 239 ,(2005) , 10.1177/1075547005281473
Cynthia Selin, Trust and the illusive force of scenarios Futures. ,vol. 38, pp. 1- 14 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.FUTURES.2005.04.001
Gene Rowe, Lynn J. Frewer, Evaluating Public Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 29, pp. 512- 556 ,(2004) , 10.1177/0162243903259197
Daniel Boy, Dominique Donnet Kamel, Philippe Roqueplo, Un exemple de démocratie participative : la « conférence de citoyens » sur les organismes génétiquement modifiés Revue française de science politique. ,vol. 50, pp. 779- 810 ,(2000) , 10.3406/RFSP.2000.395508
Alan Irwin, The Politics of Talk Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 36, pp. 299- 320 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0306312706053350