Barriers and Enablers of Integrating Health Evidence into Transport and Urban Planning and Decision Making

作者: Rosie Riley , Audrey de Nazelle

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_31

关键词:

摘要: Global rates of urbanisation are on the rise. By 2050 around 70% ten billion global population is expected to be living in cities. Whilst cities centres education, wealth creation, innovation and progress they simultaneously characterized by pollution, congestion, noise, heat overcrowding, adversely impacting human health a scale. Strategic comprehensive urban transport planning policy that integrates can ameliorate some these negative impacts. The evidence base for how we should building our future there. Nonetheless, current fails optimise outcomes. This chapter discusses barriers enablers effectively integrating into decision making. These discussed under themes (1) differing understandings between sectors (2) difficulties translation (3) governance politics (4) institutional context. second part puts forward solutions overcoming suggests enabling factors reside improving communication collaboration across disciplines. Such likely facilitated changes both context which decisions made way research developed communicated.

参考文章(50)
B Giles-Corti, F Bull, L D Frank, P Griffiths, M Stevenson, J F Sallis, R Burdett, Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities: urban design, transport, and health 3 The Lancet. ,(2016)
Corinne Autant-Bernard, Muriel Fadairo, Nadine Massard, Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence Research Policy. ,vol. 42, pp. 196- 210 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2012.07.009
P. E Plsek, T. Greenhalgh, The challenge of complexity in health care BMJ. ,vol. 323, pp. 625- 628 ,(2001) , 10.1136/BMJ.323.7313.625
Hugh Barton, Catherine Mitcham, Healthy Urban Planning ,(2001)
Ross C. Brownson, Charles Royer, Reid Ewing, Timothy D. McBride, Researchers and Policymakers American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 30, pp. 164- 172 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2005.10.004
L. Marks, D.J. Hunter, S. Scalabrini, J. Gray, S. McCafferty, N. Payne, S. Peckham, S. Salway, P. Thokala, The return of public health to local government in England: changing the parameters of the public health prioritization debate? Public Health. ,vol. 129, pp. 1194- 1203 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.PUHE.2015.07.028
Carmen Hass-Klau, A review of the evidence from Germany and the UK Transport Policy. ,vol. 1, pp. 21- 31 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0967-070X(93)90004-7
Gemma Phillips, Judith Green, Working for the public health: politics, localism and epistemologies of practice Sociology of Health and Illness. ,vol. 37, pp. 491- 505 ,(2015) , 10.1111/1467-9566.12214
Liz Schwarte, Sarah E. Samuels, Maria Boyle, Sarah E. Clark, George Flores, Bob Prentice, Local public health departments in California: changing nutrition and physical activity environments for obesity prevention. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. ,vol. 16, ,(2010) , 10.1097/PHH.0B013E3181AF63BB