Comparison of an Aggregate Scoring Method With a Consensus Scoring Method in a Measure of Clinical Reasoning Capacity

摘要: Background: Diversity of clinical reasoning paths thought among experts is well known. Nevertheless, in written assessment, the common practice to ask reach a consensus on each item and assess students unique "good answer." Purposes: To explore effects taking variability answers into account method assessment based authentic tasks: Script Concordance Test. Methods: Two different methods were used build answer keys. The first incorporated group (criterion experts) through an aggregate scoring method. second was made with obtained from criterion for answer. Scores two by another (tested compared. domain gynecology-obstetric knowledge. sample consisted 150 clerkship seven other experts). Results: In...