Time as a Subject in Sustainable Consumption

作者: Lassi Linnanen , Katariina Koistinen , Fatemeh Jouzi

DOI: 10.3390/SU13063331

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this paper was to assess the use and consistency time concept in sustainable consumption context. In field, is generally defined as a limited resource, such money, which allocated activities understood by that it to. We assessed subject matter reviewed articles verify how conceptualized used consumption. During analysis, we six categories: time-use, use, time-related rebound effects, value-action gap, pressure, well-being. Despite identical definitions, there are some inconsistencies essential assumptions regarding time, observed current recognition debates not comprehensive. Clarifying difference between an objective definition practical knowledge people have about has applications terms developing strategies policies.

参考文章(20)
Johannes Buhl, José Acosta, Work less, do less? Sustainability Science. ,vol. 11, pp. 261- 276 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11625-015-0322-8
Frank W. Geels, Andy McMeekin, Josephine Mylan, Dale Southerton, A critical appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions Global Environmental Change. ,vol. 34, pp. 1- 12 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2015.04.013
Andreas Chai, Graham Bradley, Alex Lo, Joseph Reser, What time to adapt? The role of discretionary time in sustaining the climate change value-action gap Ecological Economics. ,vol. 116, pp. 95- 107 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2015.04.013
Mario Cogoy, Consumption, time and the environment Review of Economics of the Household. ,vol. 8, pp. 459- 477 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11150-010-9092-3
Doris A. Fuchs, Sylvia Lorek, Sustainable consumtion governance: a history of promis and failures Journal of Consumer Policy. ,vol. 28, pp. 261- 288 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10603-005-8490-Z
Mikko Jalas, A time use perspective on the materials intensity of consumption Ecological Economics. ,vol. 41, pp. 109- 123 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00018-6
Karsten Bruun Hansen, Exploring compatibility between "subjective well-being" and "sustainable living" in Scandinavia. Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 122, pp. 175- 187 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11205-014-0684-9
Angela Druckman, Tim Jackson, The bare necessities: how much household carbon do we really need? Ecological Economics. ,vol. 69, pp. 1794- 1804 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2010.04.018