Retributive Justive: Its Socical Context

作者: Neil Vidmar

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499975.016

关键词:

摘要: Until relatively recently, social psychologists have given less attention to retributive justice than other forms of justice, such as distributive and procedural justice. Although interest in is increasing, the fact remains that psychological research on retribution has tended ignore, or at least downplay, insights sociologists deference an approach examines how individuals respond deviant acts. Without rejecting analyses, this chapter draws context consequences Group dynamics are play a wide array settings which people rule norm violations, but essay I will draw primarily upon more quarter century research, much it previously unpublished, community reactions criminal events. However, end argue issues raised by can should be tested mundane violations occur.

参考文章(39)
Hans Kelsen, Society and nature Arno Press. ,(1974)
John M. Darley, Mark P. Zanna, Making Moral Judgments. American Scientist. ,vol. 70, pp. 515- 521 ,(1982)
Emile Durkheim, The division of labor in society Columbia Law Review. ,vol. 35, pp. 55- 64 ,(1935) , 10.4324/9780429499838-5
Neil Vidmar, Retribution and Revenge Social Science Research Network. pp. 31- 63 ,(2002) , 10.1007/0-306-47379-8_2
Stephen C. Thaman, Europe's New Jury Systems: The Cases of Spain and Russia Law and Contemporary Problems. ,vol. 62, pp. 233- 260 ,(1999) , 10.2307/1192258
Julius Melnitzer, Neil Vidmar, Juror Prejudice: An Empirical Study of a Challenge for Cause Osgoode Hall Law Journal. ,vol. 22, pp. 487- 511 ,(1984)
Austin Sarat, Vengeance, Victims and the Identities of Law: Social & Legal Studies. ,vol. 6, pp. 163- 189 ,(1997) , 10.1177/096466399700600201