Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty

作者: Marcus Ang , Yuqiang Soh , Hla Myint Htoon , Jodhbir S. Mehta , Donald Tan

DOI: 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2016.04.049

关键词:

摘要: Purpose To compare 5-year graft survival after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating (PK) in Asian eyes. Design Prospective, nested, cohort study. Participants Consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK (423 eyes) or PK (405 for Fuchs' dystrophy (FED) bullous keratopathy (BK). Methods Clinical data donor recipient characteristics were recorded from our prospective the Singapore Corneal Transplant Registry. All surgeries performed by corneal surgeons at center, which included cases partially fellows training under direct supervision. Main Outcome Measures Five-year cumulative survival. Results Overall mean age was 67.8±9.8 years, 50.1% of men. There no significant differences ( P  = 0.261) gender 0.78) between groups predominantly Chinese (76.6%) cohort, with more BK compared FED (68.1% vs. 31.9%;  = 0.007). Cox regression analysis revealed that a factor associated failure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–5.33; 0.02) adjusting confounders such as age, gender, factors. incidence complications rejection  = 0.002) greater group group. Conclusions In eyes same study standardized surgical postoperative regimes, superior BK.

参考文章(28)
Donald T.H. Tan, Prathiba Janardhanan, Huijun Zhou, Yiong-Huak Chan, Hla Myint Htoon, Leonard P.K. Ang, Laurence S. Lim, Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 115, pp. 975- 982 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2007.08.049
Mariya Dontchev, Craig Kollman, Dan Raghinaru, Steven P. Dunn, Robert L. Schultze, David D. Verdier, Jonathan H. Lass, Irving M. Raber, Joel Sugar, Mark S. Gorovoy, Alan Sugar, R. Doyle Stulting, Monty M. Montoya, Jeffrey G. Penta, Beth Ann Benetz, Roy W. Beck, Mark J. Mannis, Edward J. Holland, Robin L. Gal, The Effect of Donor Age on Penetrating Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disease: Graft Survival after 10 Years in the Cornea Donor Study Ophthalmology. ,vol. 120, pp. 2419- 2427 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2013.08.026
W. Barry Lee, Deborah S. Jacobs, David C. Musch, Stephen C. Kaufman, William J. Reinhart, Roni M. Shtein, Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes Ophthalmology. ,vol. 116, pp. 1818- 1830 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2009.06.021
Marcus Ang, Fiona Lim, Hla M Htoon, Donald Tan, Jodhbir S Mehta, Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty British Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 100, pp. 307- 311 ,(2016) , 10.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2015-306975
Lamis Baydoun, Vasilios S. Liarakos, Isabel Dapena, Gerrit R.J. Melles, Re: Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87) Ophthalmology. ,vol. 121, ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2014.06.007
Marcus Ang, Jodhbir S. Mehta, Chelvin C.A. Sng, Hla Myint Htoon, Donald T.H. Tan, Indications, outcomes, and risk factors for failure in tectonic keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 119, pp. 1311- 1319 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2012.01.021
Marianne O. Price, Kelly M. Fairchild, David A. Price, Francis W. Price, Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Five-Year Graft Survival and Endothelial Cell Loss Ophthalmology. ,vol. 118, pp. 725- 729 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2010.08.012
Saideep Bose, Marcus Ang, Jodhbir S. Mehta, Donald T. Tan, Eric Finkelstein, Cost-Effectiveness of Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Penetrating Keratoplasty Ophthalmology. ,vol. 120, pp. 464- 470 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2012.08.024
Coster DJ, Australian Corneal Graft Registry Contributors Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA, None, A Comparison of Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasty Outcomes: A Registry Study Ophthalmology. ,vol. 121, pp. 979- 987 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2013.12.017
Sanjay V. Patel, W. John Armitage, Margareta Claesson, Keratoplasty outcomes: are we making advances? Ophthalmology. ,vol. 121, pp. 977- 978 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2014.01.029