Regime Type and Diaspora Politics: A Dyadic Approach

作者: Nikola Mirilovic

DOI: 10.1093/FPA/ORW038

关键词:

摘要: Why do some diaspora groups, but not others, play a prominent role in the formalization of cooperative political ties between their country origin and residence? This article adopts novel dyadic approach to study politics by arguing that are simultaneously structured regime type residence. Diaspora groups can foreign policy residence democracy–democracy dyads (i.e., when both democratic). In all other (including authoritarian–authoritarian), groups’ impact on tends be limited. The dyad approximates necessary (but sufficient) condition; nationalism international economic strategies adopted help shape politics. examines four focusing authoritarian Malaysia democratic United States, which have notable populations Chinese Indian origin.

参考文章(79)
Thomas Faist, Diaspora and Transnationalism: What Kind of Dance Partners? Diaspora and Transnationalism: Concepts, Theories and Methods. pp. 34- ,(2010)
Carles Boix, Democracy and redistribution ,(2003)
P Ramasamy, K Kesavapany, A Mani, Rising India and Indian Communities in East Asia ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. ,(2008)
Liesl Riddle, Diasporas: Exploring their Development Potential Journal of Microfinance / ESR Review. ,vol. 10, pp. 6- ,(2008)
Michael Bommes, Dietrich Thränhardt, National Paradigms of Migration Research V & R unipress : Universitätsverlag Osnabrück. ,(2010)
Rainer Bauböck, Thomas Faist, Diaspora and transnationalism : concepts, theories and methods IMISCOE research. pp. 360- ,(2010) , 10.5117/9789089642387