Assessment Validation in the Context of High‐Stakes Assessment

作者: Katherine Ryan

DOI: 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2002.TB00080.X

关键词:

摘要: Including the perspectives of stakeholder groups (e.g., teachers, parents) can improve validity high-stakes assessment interpretations and uses. How view assessments their uses may differ significantly from state-level policy officials. The views these stakeholders contribute to identifying strengths weaknesses intended This article proposes a process approach that addresses validation in context assessment. includes test evaluator or validator who considers five at four different stages maturity relationship six aspects construct validity. tasks how stakeholders' might be incorporated are illustrated each stage maturity. make judgments about merit is discussed.

参考文章(18)
Ernest R. House, Putting things together coherently: Logic and justice New Directions for Evaluation. ,vol. 1995, pp. 33- 48 ,(1995) , 10.1002/EV.1018
Haggai Kupermintz, Michele M. Ennis, Laura S. Hamilton, Joan E. Talbert, Richard E. Snow, In Dedication: Leigh Burstein American Educational Research Journal. ,vol. 32, pp. 525- 554 ,(1995) , 10.3102/00028312032003525
Suzzane Lane, Carol S. Parke, Clement A. Stone, A Framework for Evaluating the Consequences Programs of Assessment Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 17, pp. 24- 28 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.TB00830.X
Edward H. Haertel, Validity Arguments for High‐stakes Testing: In Search of the Evidence Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 18, pp. 5- 9 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1999.TB00276.X
Pamela A. Moss, The Role of Consequences in validity Theory Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 17, pp. 6- 12 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.TB00826.X
J. Anthony Blair, Informal logic and reasoning in evaluation New Directions for Evaluation. ,vol. 1995, pp. 71- 80 ,(1995) , 10.1002/EV.1020
Michael Scriven, The final synthesis Evaluation Practice. ,vol. 15, pp. 367- 382 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0886-1633(94)90031-0
Robert L. Linn, Partitioning Responsibility for the Evaluation of the Conseqyences of Assessment Programs Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 17, pp. 28- 30 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1998.TB00831.X
Lorrie A. Shepard, Evaluating Test Validity Review of Research in Education. ,vol. 19, pp. 405- ,(1993) , 10.2307/1167347