A Multi-Practice Ethics of Domesticated and “Wild” Animals

作者: Michiel Korthals

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_10

关键词:

摘要: Many animal ethicists take as a reference wild, non-domesticated animals or in their “natural” habitat, i.e., the habitat that are supposed to have had, before humans interfered. Furthermore, they seem suggest ethical decision-making about treatment of can abstract from social and cultural context these animals. In this chapter, I will tackle two presuppositions by pragmatist approach. Firstly, want explore changing relations between wild domesticated and, especially, pay attention being de-domesticated. course my argumentation it become clear we speak only certain extent, because intervene everywhere on earth into lives Being is more like limit concept than realistic characteristic. This case, then, secondly, spend time considering diverse dilemmas managing world where not status at stake but also environmental, esthetic meaning implications livestock The ask for an ethics responsibility with respect animals, which considers effects all stakeholders.

参考文章(31)
Harold W. Gonyou, Chapter 11 – The Welfare of Physiologically Modified Animals Low-Fat Meats#R##N#Design Strategies and Human Implications. pp. 191- 202 ,(1994) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-091853-2.50016-0
Sandoe P, Nielsen Bl, Sorensen P, Christensen Lg, Staying good while playing god--the ethics of breeding farm animals. Animal welfare (South Mimms, England). ,vol. 8, pp. 313- 328 ,(1999)
David S. Landes, Denis Clerc, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations L'Économie politique. pp. 107- 112 ,(2001)
Leland S. Shapiro, Applied Animal Ethics ,(1999)
Peter Singer, In Defense of Animals ,(1985)
J. Serpell, In the company of animals. In the company of animals.. ,(1986)
D. M. Broom, Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 69, pp. 4167- 4175 ,(1991) , 10.2527/1991.69104167X
Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, The hidden life of dogs ,(1993)