Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials: the case for standardisation.

作者: N. Bellamy , W. W. Buchanan

DOI: 10.1007/BF02032334

关键词:

摘要: Outcome measures for clinical trials to be valid and reliable should also responsive change. There are currently no standardised methods of measuring the outcome in osteoarthritis trials. A review 63 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs revealed a large degree variability items, instruments scales employed. The implications this discussed proposed rationalising measurement area research.

参考文章(86)
Smyth Cj, Vaughan Jh, Holman Ki, Martinez-Lavin M, A comparison of naproxen, indomethacin and aspirin in osteoarthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 7, pp. 711- ,(1980)
Douglas Taylor, A Table for the Degree of Involvement in Chronic Arthritis Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 36, pp. 608- 610 ,(1937)
Jette Am, Functional capacity evaluation: an empirical approach. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 61, pp. 85- ,(1980)
A Glynne, V C Tyson, A comparative study of benoxaprofen and ibuprofen in osteoarthritis in general practice The Journal of Rheumatology Supplement. ,vol. 6, pp. 132- 138 ,(1980)
Sawaf Ms, Perry Jd, Carter Me, Fowler Pd, Barnes Cg, Wright, Berry H, Downie Ww, Moll Jm, Diclofenac sodium (Voltarol) and indomethacin: a multicentre comparative study in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation. pp. 135- ,(1979)
Busson M, Brackertz B, Comparative study of sulindac (Clinoril) and ibuprofen (Brufen) in osteoarthrosis. The British journal of clinical practice. ,vol. 32, pp. 77- 80 ,(1978)
Jette Am, Functional Status Index: reliability of a chronic disease evaluation instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 61, pp. 395- 401 ,(1980)
Edward G. Carmines, Richard A. Zeller, Reliability and Validity Assessment ,(1979)
Donovan Jf, Hearron Ms, Royer Gl, Moxley Te, Miyara A, A six-month double-blind trial of ibuprofen and indomethacin in osteoarthritis. Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental. ,vol. 17, pp. 234- 248 ,(1975)