Assessing what to address in science communication

作者: W. Bruine de Bruin , A. Bostrom

DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.1212729110

关键词:

摘要: As members of a democratic society, individuals face complex decisions about whether to support climate change mitigation, vaccinations, genetically modified food, nanotechnology, geoengineering, and so on. To inform people’s public debate, scientific experts at government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, other organizations aim provide understandable scientifically accurate communication materials. Such communications improve understanding the decision-relevant issues, if needed, promote behavior change. Unfortunately, existing sometimes fail when lack information what people need know make more informed or wording use describe relevant concepts. We an introduction for how mental models research with intended audience their efforts. Specifically, we conduct interviews characterize beliefs topic under consideration, identify gaps misconceptions in knowledge, reveal preferred wording. also methods designing follow-up surveys larger samples examine prevalence as well relationships behaviors. Finally, discuss findings from these can be used design that effectively address they understand. present applications different domains, showing this approach leads recipients’ ability decisions.

参考文章(90)
W van der Klaauw, G Topa, W Bruine de Bruin, Inflation expectations: The biasing effect of thoughts about specific prices Elsevier. ,(2011)
McKenney Nr, Bennett Ce, Issues regarding data on race and ethnicity: the Census Bureau experience. Public Health Reports. ,vol. 109, pp. 16- 25 ,(1994)
Marsha C. Lovett, Priti Shah, Thinking With Data Psychology Press. ,(2007) , 10.4324/9780203810057
Michael Siegrist, Heinz Gutscher, Timothy C. Earle, Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind ,(2007)
H Russell Bernard, Amber Wutich, Gery W Ryan, Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches ,(2009)
Abraham Tesser, Advanced social psychology McGraw-Hill. ,(1995)
Ronald Giere, Cognitive Models of Science ,(1992)
James P. Spradley, The ethnographic interview ,(1979)
Gideon Keren, Perspectives on framing Psychology Press. ,(2011) , 10.4324/9780203854167
J. P. Kincaid, Jr. Fishburne, Rogers Robert P., Chissom Richard L., Brad S., Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 (AD-A006 655/5GA, MF $2.25, PC $3.75). ,(1975) , 10.21236/ADA006655