Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians.

作者: P. Capmas , L. J. Salomon , O. Picone , F. Fuchs , R. Frydman

DOI: 10.1002/PD.2417

关键词:

摘要: Objective To compare retrospectively the distribution of foetal biometry data as measured by midwives and physicians during second third trimester screening an unselected population pregnant women. Methods Standard measurements biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal (AC), femur length (FL) were performed four ten at 20 to 24 weeks gestation 30 34 part routine ultrasound examinations over a 26-month period (Jan. 2005–Mar. 2007). All converted into Z-scores using different prediction equations. The reference chart best fitting our practice was determined for each fetal parameter (French College Sonographers BPD, Chitty et al. HC FL, Snidjers Nicolaides AC). means SDs Z-score distributions collected compared Student's t-test Fisher-Snedecor test SDs. Results We retrieved 1566 1631 made respectively between gestation, 1710 1578 gestation. Mean values recorded significantly closer 0 (p < 0.05) many parameters. SD also lower below 1. Conclusion In this study, have greater tendency than normalize data. Such normalization may hamper sensitivity abnormal growth. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(9)
S. C. Perni, F. A. Chervenak, R. B. Kalish, S. Magherini-Rothe, M. Predanic, J. Streltzoff, D. W. Skupski, Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 24, pp. 654- 658 ,(2004) , 10.1002/UOG.1717
A. Herman, R. Maymon, E. Dreazen, E. Caspi, I. Bukovsky, Z. Weinraub, Nuchal translucency audit: a novel image-scoring method Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 12, pp. 398- 403 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1998.12060398.X
L.-J. Salomon, J.-P. Bernard, Y. Ville, Le contrôle de qualité en échographie prénatale : intérêt de la biométrie Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite. ,vol. 34, pp. 683- 691 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.GYOBFE.2006.07.026
R. J. M. Snijders, K. H. Nicolaides, Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 4, pp. 34- 48 ,(1994) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1994.04010034.X
L. J. Salomon, J. P. Bernard, M. Duyme, I. Buvat, Y. Ville, The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 25, pp. 559- 565 ,(2005) , 10.1002/UOG.1901
L. J. Salomon, M. Duyme, J. Crequat, G. Brodaty, C. Talmant, N. Fries, M. Althuser, French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 28, pp. 193- 198 ,(2006) , 10.1002/UOG.2733
L. J. Salomon, J. P. Bernard, Y. Ville, Analysis of Z-score distribution for the quality control of fetal ultrasound measurements at 20-24 weeks. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 26, pp. 750- 754 ,(2005) , 10.1002/UOG.2640
Lyn S. Chitty, Douglas G. Altman, Annabel Henderson, Stuart Campbell, CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .4. FEMUR LENGTH British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 101, pp. 132- 135 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1994.TB13078.X
Lyn S. Chitty, Douglas G. Altman, Annabel Henderson, Stuart Campbell, CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .2. HEAD MEASUREMENTS British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 101, pp. 35- 43 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1994.TB13007.X