Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: Can clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasonographic scanning alone replace traditional arteriography for carotid surgery workup? A prospective study

作者: Enzo Ballotta , Giuseppe Da Giau , Elvira Abbruzzese , Marina Saladini , Laura Renon

DOI: 10.1067/MSY.1999.98926

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) alone can replace contrast cerebral arteriography (CA) for the detection patients suitable surgery at our institution. Methods: During an 18-month period, 100 underwent DUS CA during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All were studied prospectively; in each case initial decision or against CEA on basis internal arteries (ICAs) subsequently compared with surgeon's final management plan after CA. Of 200 ICAs evaluated, 113 considered but 14 excluded from because patient could not be evaluated before This left 99 (86 patients) available comparative analysis. Results: outcome 2 diagnostic modalities perfectly consistent 95.3% (κ = 0.969). altered by findings only cases (2%). suitable, 97 CEA. No arteriographic complications occurred among undergoing perioperative stroke risk mortality rates 0%. Conclusions: Ninety-eight percent would have received appropriate treatment strength patients' neurologic history alone. Our results indicate that is sufficient establish need symptomatic asymptomatic being most circumstances. (Surgery 1999;126:20-7.)

参考文章(48)
Ramsey De, Mattos Ma, Hodgson Kj, Sumner Ds, Mansour A, Barkmeier Ld, Faught We, Carotid endarterectomy without angiography: is color-flow duplex scanning sufficient? Surgery. ,vol. 116, pp. 776- 783 ,(1994)
Moore Ws, Carotid endarterectomy for prevention of stroke. Western Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 159, pp. 37- 43 ,(1993)
D. E. Strandness, Duplex scanning in vascular disorders Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ,(1990)
P C Davis, J C Hoffman, W W Beckett, Duplex Doppler sonography of the carotid artery: false-positive results in an artery contralateral to an artery with marked stenosis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 11, pp. 1049- 1053 ,(1990)
G J Hankey, C P Warlow, R J Sellar, Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. ,vol. 21, pp. 209- 222 ,(1990) , 10.1161/01.STR.21.2.209
WESLEY S. MOORE, STANLEY ZIOMEK, WILLIAM J. QUIÑONES-BALDRICH, HERBERT I. MACHLEDER, RONALD W. BUSUTTIL, J. DENNIS BAKER, Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for arteriography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 208, pp. 91- 94 ,(1988) , 10.1097/00000658-198807000-00013
JOSEPH S. LADOWSKI, MARSHALL W. WEBSTER, HOWARD O. YONAS, DAVID L. STEED, Carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic intracranial aneurysm. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 200, pp. 70- 73 ,(1984) , 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00012
David J. Phillips, Kirk W. Beach, Jean Primozich, D.E. Strandness, Should results of ultrasound Doppler studies be reported in units of frequency or velocity Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 15, pp. 205- 212 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90065-3
Y. Langlois, G.O. Roederer, A. Chan, D.J. Phillips, K.W. Beach, D. Martin, P.M. Chikos, D.E. Strandness, Evaluating carotid artery disease. The concordance between pulsed Doppler/spectrum analysis and angiography. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 9, pp. 51- 63 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0301-5629(83)90109-6