作者: Tasos Hovardas
DOI: 10.5772/31480
关键词:
摘要: Sustainable forest management is conceptualized as a system which attempts to conciliate economic, ecological, and social dimensions (Maes et al., 2011; Vierikko 2008). In this direction, sustainable will have foresee mechanisms institutional arrangements for resolving trade-offs among multiple actors with conflicting interests (Bernues 2005; Van Gossum 2011). Decisionmaking schemes that involve variety of interest groups might lead increased complexity due the societal demand rational transparent deliberation processes (Brechin 2002; Wolfslehner & Seidl, 2010). A major challenge handle well confront uncertainty, originates from changes in positions stakeholders, scientific theories, institutions (Foster One response employ adaptive management, presupposes feedback reflexive learning necessary prerequisites cope an undetermined future core issues risk uncertainty (Plummer Fennell, 2009; Von Detten, However, aspects sustainability are frequently downplayed even configurations. Previous studies showed conventional methods science research widely implemented policies underestimate heterogeneity at local level substantial extent (Berninger 2010; Sugimura Howard, This inadequate handling context be expressed matters environmental governance. For instance, when communities represented by spokespersons adhering majorities, minority excluded (Hovardas Hovik present paper we approach notion critically examining case study Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park (DNP) Greece. Our basic objective exemplify how protected area can succeed guaranteeing viable population sizes endangered species but, same time, it eventuate new situations regarding fire suppression ecotourism development. Next, mixed-motive perspective formulated