Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling

作者: Jesus Palomo , David B. Dunson , Ken Bollen

DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452044-9/50011-2

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Structural equation models (SEMs) with latent variables are routinely used in social science research, and of increasing importance biomedical applications. Standard practice implementing SEMs relies on frequentist methods. A simple concise description an alternative Bayesian approach is developed. Furthermore, a brief overview the literature, specification SEMs, outline Gibbs sampling strategy for model fitting provided. inferences illustrated through industrialization democratization case study from literature. The has some distinct advantages, due to availability samples joint posterior distribution parameters variables, that highlighted. These provide important information not contained measurement structural parameters. As using study, this can often valuable insight into relationships.

参考文章(50)
Gerhard Arminger, Ulrich Küsters, Latent Trait Models with Indicators of Mixed Measurement Level Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 51- 73 ,(1988) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-5644-9_4
Fan Yang, Karl G. Jöreskog, Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with Interaction effects Advanced structural equation modeling: issues and techniques, 1996, ISBN 0-8058-1819-7, págs. 57-88. pp. 57- 88 ,(1996)
Adrian E. Raftery, Steven Lewis, How Many Iterations in the Gibbs Sampler Defense Technical Information Center. ,(1991) , 10.21236/ADA640705
M.A. Croon, A. Bolck, On the use of factor scores in structural equations models WORC Paper. ,(1997)
Sik-Yum Lee, Xin-Yuan Song, Bayesian model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with missing continuous and ordinal categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. ,vol. 57, pp. 131- 150 ,(2004) , 10.1348/000711004849204
Sik-Yum Lee, Jian-Qing Shi, Joint Bayesian Analysis of Factor Scores and Structural Parameters in the Factor Analysis Model Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. ,vol. 52, pp. 722- 736 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1017529427433