Stimulating authentic community involvement in biotechnology policy in Australia

作者: Renato Schibeci , Jeffrey Harwood

DOI: 10.1177/0963662506067909

关键词:

摘要: This paper analyzes community involvement in biotechnology policy Australia. Specifically, we examine the Gene Technology Act 2000 that governs gene technology Australia and roles of Office Regulator Community Consultative Committee. We contend institutions underpin serve to hamper reinforce a cognitive deficit model involvement. Finally, propose how situation could be turned around so interested citizens can participate authentic

参考文章(24)
Ronald A. Corso, Keeping the Public Informed Civil Engineering. ,vol. 68, pp. 36- 37 ,(1998)
Robert E. Goodin, The Theory of Institutional Design: Institutions and Their Design Cambridge University Press. pp. 1- 53 ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511558320.002
Judith Bush, Suzanne Moffatt, Christine E. Dunn, Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 213- 229 ,(2001) , 10.1088/0963-6625/10/2/304
Alan Irwin, Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 18 ,(2001) , 10.3109/A036852
Jane Macoubrie, Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government: Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 15, pp. 221- 241 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0963662506056993
Renato Schibeci, Jeff Harwood, Heather Dietrich, Community involvement in biotechnology policy?: The Australian experience Science Communication. ,vol. 27, pp. 429- 445 ,(2006) , 10.1177/1075547005285066
Gene Rowe, Tom Horlick-Jones, John Walls, Nick Pidgeon, Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 331- 352 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0963662505056611