Comparison of alternative pest and soil management strategies for Maine potato production systems

作者: E.R. Gallandt , E.B. Mallory , A.R. Alford , F.A. Drummond , E. Groden

DOI: 10.1017/S0889189300007864

关键词:

摘要: Potato acreage and total production in Maine have declined steadily since the 1960s. In 1991, a University of research team established large-scale, long-term, comparative study three factors that form foundation productive potato cropping systems: soil management, pest variety choice. This study, Ecosystem Project, included 96 main plots (5.8 ha total) near-by “component studies.” The project contrasted amended vs. unamended management strategies; conventional reduced-input bio-intensive disease stress susceptible tolerant varieties. Given recent concerns over resistance to pesticides increasing costs agricultural chemical inputs, systems provided encouraging results. Weed growth was similar systems. Colorado beetle thresholds were exceeded less often their densities lower system than Lady beetles, which are major aphid predators, more abundant compared with 5 6 years. Tuber yield quality maintained at high level system, although difficulties plant disease, nutrient weed contributed significantly yields system. Economic analysis indicated from 1993 1996, had greater return variable cost (avg. $973 -1 ) $890ha $578ha ). achieved rapid improvements quality: organic matter, water stable aggregates, potassium, soluble inorganic phosphorus contents increased while requirements for synthetic fertilizers reduced. These enhanced late-season crop vigor, canopy duration tuber quality, by 13% 30% 1994 1995, respectively, but not 1996. Improved vigor also benefited control efforts weed-suppressive crop. biointensive weeds controlled mechanically, biomass 1995. Conversely, consistently flea populations and, one two years, incidence Rhizoctonia. choice affected dynamics. Total density (all species considered together) almost all ratings higher on ‘Superior’ ‘Atlantic’ potato.

参考文章(16)
Rod J. MacRae, Stuart B. Hill, Guy R. Mehuys, John Henning, Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy. ,vol. 43, pp. 155- 198 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60478-2
A. L. Page, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. ,(1982)
Eero Varis, Leena Pietilä, Kauko Koikkalainen, Comparison of Conventional, Integrated and Organic Potato Production in Field Experiments in Finland Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-soil and Plant Science. ,vol. 46, pp. 41- 48 ,(1996) , 10.1080/09064719609410945
D. M. Huber, Effect of Organic Amendment on Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens Phytopathology. ,vol. 60, pp. 22- 26 ,(1970) , 10.1094/PHYTO-60-22
Joshua L. Posner, Michael D. Casler, Jon O. Baldock, The Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trial : combining agroecology with production agronomy Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. ,vol. 10, pp. 98- 107 ,(1995) , 10.1017/S0889189300006238
Gregory A. Porter, Jonathan A. Sisson, Petiole nitrate content of Maine-grown Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes in response to varying nitrogen rate American Journal of Potato Research. ,vol. 68, pp. 493- 505 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF02853766
James D. Smolik, Thomas L. Dobbs, Diane H. Rickerl, The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. ,vol. 10, pp. 25- 35 ,(1995) , 10.1017/S0889189300006081
Steven R. Temple, Diana B. Friedman, Oscar Somasco, Howard Ferris, Kate Scow, Karen Klonsky, An interdisciplinary, experiment station-based participatory comparison of alternative crop management systems for California's Sacramento Valley Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. ,vol. 9, pp. 64- 71 ,(1994) , 10.1017/S0889189300005609