A Bayesian belief network approach for mapping water conservation ecosystem service optimization region

作者: Li Zeng , Jing Li

DOI: 10.1007/S11442-019-1642-X

关键词:

摘要: Water conservation is one of the most important ecosystem services terrestrial ecosystems. Identifying optimization regions water using Bayesian belief networks not only helps develop a better understanding processes but also increases rationality scenario design and pattern optimization. This study establishes network model. The model, based on networks, forecasts distribution probability projected under different land use scenarios for year 2050 with CA-Markov A key variable subset method proposed to optimize spatial conservation. Three findings were obtained. First, among three scenarios, high value was largest protection scenario, this conducive formulation future policies. Second, influencing factors impacting included precipitation, evapotranspiration use, state set corresponding highest mainly distributed in areas annual average rainfall vegetation coverage. Third, suitable optimizing southern part Maiji District Tianshui, southwest Longxian south Weibin Baoji, northeast Xunyi County northwest Yongshou Xianyang, west Yaozhou Tongchuan.

参考文章(24)
Kari L. Vigerstol, Juliann E. Aukema, A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 92, pp. 2403- 2409 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2011.06.040
Emma Pharo, None, Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. The Bryologist. ,vol. 101, pp. 475- ,(1998) , 10.2307/3244191
Dries Landuyt, Steven Broekx, Rob D'hondt, Guy Engelen, Joris Aertsens, Peter L.M. Goethals, A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 46, pp. 1- 11 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2013.03.011
Serena H. Chen, Carmel A. Pollino, Good practice in Bayesian network modelling Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 37, pp. 134- 145 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2012.03.012
Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza, James Regetz, Stephen Polasky, Heather Tallis, DRichard Cameron, Kai MA Chan, Gretchen C Daily, Joshua Goldstein, Peter M Kareiva, Eric Lonsdorf, Robin Naidoo, Taylor H Ricketts, MRebecca Shaw, Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 7, pp. 4- 11 ,(2009) , 10.1890/080023
Russell G. Congalton, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data Remote Sensing of Environment. ,vol. 37, pp. 35- 46 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
Kate A. Brauman, Gretchen C. Daily, T. Ka’eo Duarte, Harold A. Mooney, The Nature and Value of Ecosystem Services: An Overview Highlighting Hydrologic Services Annual Review of Environment and Resources. ,vol. 32, pp. 67- 98 ,(2007) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.ENERGY.32.031306.102758
Julen Gonzalez-Redin, Sandra Luque, Laura Poggio, Ron Smith, Alessandro Gimona, Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes. Environmental Research. ,vol. 144, pp. 15- 26 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.ENVRES.2015.11.009
Dries Landuyt, Steven Broekx, Guy Engelen, Inge Uljee, Maarten Van der Meulen, Peter L.M. Goethals, The importance of uncertainties in scenario analyses – A study on future ecosystem service delivery in Flanders Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 553, pp. 504- 518 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.02.098