Explaining field differences in openness and sharing in scientific communities

作者: Theresa Velden

DOI: 10.1145/2441776.2441827

关键词:

摘要: This paper explores field differences in openness and sharing of scientific knowledge based on a comparative ethnographic study research groups two specialties. Tensions between cooperation the one hand competition for priority secrecy other are common science. However, fields differ how these tensions play out, influencing what information is exchanged when among field. develops an explanatory framework that identifies assumptions made generic model collective production process sciences specifies epistemic material characteristics affect to extent those hold specific field, explaining behaviors. I suggest field-inherent sources behaviors need be accounted policies design communication systems aim support advance

参考文章(35)
Jochen GläSer, Grit Laudel, The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 101- 123 ,(2007) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5
Jochen Gläser, What Internet Use Does and Does Not Change in Scientific Communities Science and technology studies. ,vol. 16, pp. 38- 51 ,(2003) , 10.23987/STS.55158
William D. Garvey, Communication, the essence of science Pergamon Press. ,(1979)
Robert E. Kohler, Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life.. ,(1994)
STEPHEN HILGARTNER, Biomolecular Databases New Communication Regimes for Biology Science Communication. ,vol. 17, pp. 240- 263 ,(1995) , 10.1177/1075547095017002009
John P. Walsh, Todd Bayma, Computer Networks and Scientific Work Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 26, pp. 661- 703 ,(1996) , 10.1177/030631296026003006
Jeremy P. Birnholtz, Matthew J. Bietz, Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering international conference on supporting group work. pp. 339- 348 ,(2003) , 10.1145/958160.958215
Michael Nentwich, Cyberscience: Modelling ICT-induced changes of the scholarly communication system Information, Communication & Society. ,vol. 8, pp. 542- 560 ,(2005) , 10.1080/13691180500418451