Shared Decision Making in Orthopaedic Surgery: More Than Two to Tango?

作者: Terence J. Gioe

DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00723

关键词:

摘要: Orthopaedic surgeons have had relatively little exposure to shared decision-making tools in their practice. First popularized a 1982 report issued by the President’s Commission for Study of Ethical Problems Medicine and Biomedical Behavioral Research1, decision making is generally viewed as an embodiment principle patient-centered care, with decisions between patients providers often facilitated communication aids. Charles et al.2 identified characteristics involving patient provider, both parties participating treatment process, requiring information sharing, agreeing made, recognition that many these are continuous variables. The authors present study previously made important contributions our understanding how might be incorporated into orthopaedic practice, attendant benefits obstacles overcome3,4. Knee hip osteoarthritis includes medical surgical interventions managed orthopaedists, when pain disability unresponsive treatment, total joint arthroplasty frequently recommended. Total appropriately preference-sensitive procedure, indications driven patients’ perception pain, …

参考文章(3)
Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni, Tim Whelan, Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango) Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 44, pp. 681- 692 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3
Jiwon Youm, Kate Chenok, Jeff Belkora, Vanessa Chan, Kevin J. Bozic, The Emerging Case for Shared Decision Making in Orthopaedics Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 94, pp. 1907- 1912 ,(2012) , 10.2106/00004623-201210170-00011
Kevin J. Bozic, Vanessa Chiu, Emerging Ideas Shared Decision Making in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 469, pp. 2081- 2085 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11999-010-1740-7