Entre o reflexo e a proposição: dilemas sobre o encerramento dos fóruns deliberativos

作者: Luigi Bobbio

DOI: 10.1590/S1517-45222012000200003

关键词:

摘要: How can we end a deliberation? What is the concrete result that deliberative forum may address to institutions and public? The theory not clear on this issue, while practice tends switch between different solutions. In principle, conclusion of deliberation should meet two criteria: faithfulness straightforwardness. Since these criteria are contradictory, practical experiences tend favour one them. Through analysis most diffused practices, paper considers four types conclusions, them point mostly fidelity (the "mirror conclusions") straightforwardness "proposal conclusions").  strengths weaknesses then evaluated.

参考文章(29)
Simon Niemeyer, John S. Dryzek, The Ends of Deliberation: Meta-consensus and Inter-subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes Swiss Political Science Review. ,vol. 13, pp. 497- 526 ,(2007) , 10.1002/J.1662-6370.2007.TB00087.X
Alison Kadlec, Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy Theoria. ,vol. 55, pp. 54- 80 ,(2008) , 10.3167/TH.2008.5511704
Luigi Bobbio, Types of Deliberation Journal of Public Deliberation. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- ,(2020) , 10.16997/JDD.105
Jonathan Quetzal Tritter, Alison McCallum, None, The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. ,vol. 76, pp. 156- 168 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2005.05.008
François Thoreau, Laurent (Brice), Les politiques des nanotechnologies. Pour un traitement démocratique d’une science émergente Politix : Revue des Sciences Sociales du Politique. ,(2011)
Bernard Manin, Délibération et discussion Revue Suisse de Science Politique. ,vol. 10, pp. 180- 192 ,(2004)
M. Aicardi, Vito Garramone, Paradise l’OST? Spunti per l’uso e l’analisi dell’Open Space Technology Franco Angeli. pp. 1- 286 ,(2010)
Cass R. Sunstein, The Law of Group Polarization Journal of Political Philosophy. ,vol. 10, pp. 175- 195 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1467-9760.00148