Legitimation and Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Field

作者: Isabela Ieţcu-Fairclough

DOI: 10.1007/S10503-008-9088-9

关键词:

摘要: This article combines a pragma-dialectical conception of argumentation, sociological legitimacy and theory the political field. In particular, it draws on theorization field developed by Pierre Bourdieu tries to determine what new insights into concept strategic maneuvering might be offered analysis I analyze speech made President Romania, Traian Băsescu, following his suspension Parliament in April 2007. suggest that argument this can regarded as an example adjudication discuss its specificity electoral campaign. also try relate legitimation strategy oriented meeting contradictory demands field, which see—following Bourdieu—as involving double game, game democratic representation power.

参考文章(13)
Scott Jacobs, Messages, Functional Contexts, and Categories of Fallacy Dialectic and Rhetoric. pp. 119- 130 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_9
Jürgen Habermas, Thomas McCarthy, The Theory of Communicative Action ,(1981)
P. Houtlosser, F.H. van Eemeren, Coming to grips with argumentative discourse Studies in Critical Thinking and Informal Logic. ,(2007)
Jürgen Habermas, Thomas McCarthy, Reason and the rationalization of society Beacon Press. ,(1984)
Jürgen Habermas, William Outhwaite, The Habermas Reader ,(1996)
Stephen Edelston Toulmin, The uses of argument ,(1958)
David Beetham, The Legitimation of Power ,(1991)
Isabela Ieţcu-Fairclough, Branding and strategic maneuvering in the Romanian presidential election of 2004 Branding Political Entities in a Globalised World. ,vol. 7, pp. 372- 390 ,(2008) , 10.1075/JLP.7.3.02IET
Pierre Bourdieu, Matthew Adamson, Gino Raymond, Ian Buchanan, Language and symbolic power ,(1991)