COIStories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science

作者: Michel Janssen

DOI: 10.1162/106361402322288066

关键词:

摘要: This paper takes as its point of departure two striking incongruities between scientific practice and trends in modern history philosophy science. (1) Many historians science are so preoccupied with local practices that they fail to recognize important non-local elements. (2) philosophers make a sharp distinction explanation evidence, whereas explanatory power is routinely used evidence for claims. I draw attention one specific way

参考文章(124)
Philip Kitcher, Two Approaches to Explanation The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 82, pp. 632- 639 ,(1985) , 10.2307/2026419
Philip Kitcher, Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. ,(1989)
Peter Lipton, IS THE BEST GOOD ENOUGH Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. ,vol. 93, pp. 89- 104 ,(1993)
Philip Kitcher, Wesley C. Salmon, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science ,(1989)
Peter Lipton, What Good is an Explanation? Explanation. pp. 43- 59 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-94-015-9731-9_2
Michael Friedman, Explanation and Scientific Understanding The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 71, pp. 5- 19 ,(1974) , 10.2307/2024924
John J. Stachel, Einstein from 'B' to 'Z' ,(2001)
Eric von Rosen, Three Copernican Treatises ,(2004)