Two Systems of Reasoning

摘要: THE EMPIRICAL CASE FOR TWO SYSTEMS OF REASONING The stimulation from a classic paper in the heuristics and biases tradition does not come only insights provided into processes of judgment decision making; it also comes anxiety, tension introduced between immediate intuition more measured rational belief. Clearly, there is limit to how much one's interest piqued by reading about other people's mistakes. It our own mistakes, they bring, that are so arresting compelling. revealing because reflects gap within heads between, on one hand, intuitions and, those beliefs we consider . demonstrations often suggest two minds at work: following “natural assessment methods” like representativeness availability; working form coherent, justifiable sets plans action. As Tversky Kahneman have repeatedly shown, do always agree. distinction these can be construed terms central puzzles experimental psychology – whether people best conceived as parallel processors information who operate along diffuse associative links, or analysts deliberate sequential manipulation internal representations. Do draw inferences through network learned pathways applying some kind psycho-logic manipulates symbolic tokens rule-governed manner?