Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic and Screening Test Accuracy Evaluations: Methodologic Primer

作者: Constantine Gatsonis , Prashni Paliwal

DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0226

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE. Interest in evidence-based diagnosis is growing rapidly as diagnostic and screening techniques proliferate. In this article we provide an overview of systematic reviews performance discuss detail statistical methods for the most common variant problem: meta-analysis studies which a pair estimates sensitivity specificity reported. The need to account possible variations threshold test positivity across led formulation Summary ROC (SROC) curve method. We graphical model-based ways estimate, summarize, compare SROC curves, present example from data on staging cervical cancer. also brief survey methodologic literature addressing heterogeneity, correlated data, multiple thresholds per study, studies. conclude with discussion significant challenges that continue face investigator...

参考文章(52)
Hanley Ja, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging. ,vol. 29, pp. 307- 335 ,(1989)
Alicia Y. Toledano, Cancer diagnostics: statistical methods. Cancer treatment and research. ,vol. 113, pp. 183- 217 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-3571-0_9
Alicia Y. Toledano, Benjamin A. Herman, Case study: evaluating accuracy of cancer diagnostic tests. Cancer treatment and research. ,vol. 113, pp. 219- 232 ,(2002) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-3571-0_10
Xiao-Hua Zhou, Nancy A. Obuchowski, Donna K. McClish, Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine Wiley Blackwell. ,(2002) , 10.1002/9780470906514
Donald F. Morrison, Multivariate statistical methods Published in <b>1976</b> in New York NY) by McGraw-Hill. ,(1976)
W.L.J.M. Devillé, P.D. Bezemer, L.M. Bouter, Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 53, pp. 65- 69 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00144-4
Susan Weinstein, Nancy A. Obuchowski, Michael L. Lieber, Clinical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 184, pp. 14- 19 ,(2005) , 10.2214/AJR.184.1.01840014