Dialogue in Evaluation: A Hermeneutic Perspective:

作者: Guy A. M. Widdershoven

DOI: 10.1177/13563890122209676

关键词:

摘要: Dialogue is crucial to evaluation. Through dialogue, people are invited develop new, shared ways of seeing and acting. From a hermeneutic perspective, dialogue implies consensus, based upon meanings oriented towards reaching agreement. also disagreement, in the form conflict between different, rival stories. The role evaluator enter into with participating practice. It stimulate participants. This requires support for marginalized voices, but attention voices those who power. Only if tries understand values endorsed practice prepared listen stories all parties involved, can evaluation become which participants contribute.

参考文章(10)
Paul Ricoeur, Temps et récit Seuil. ,(1983)
Amia Lieblich, Ruthellen Josselson, The narrative study of lives Sage Pub.. ,(1993)
Ernest R. House, Kenneth Ross Howe, Values in Evaluation and Social Research ,(1999)
Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode ,(1960)
Jürgen Habermas, Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik Suhrkamp. ,(1991)
Terry Winograd, Fernando Flores, Understanding computers and cognition ,(1986)
Egon G. Guba, Yvonna S. Lincoln, Fourth Generation Evaluation ,(1989)
Ezekiel J Emanuel, Linda L Emanuel, Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship JAMA. ,vol. 267, pp. 2221- 2226 ,(1992) , 10.1001/JAMA.1992.03480160079038
L. O. Kattsoff, Edmund Husserl, Walter Biemel, Ideen zu einer reinen Phanomenologie und Phanomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Allgemeine Einfuhrung in die Reine Phanomenologie. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 139- ,(1951) , 10.2307/2103376