Causes and impact of specimen rejection in a clinical chemistry laboratory

作者: Liyun Cao , Meng Chen , Ron A. Phipps , Robert E. Del Guidice , Beverly C. Handy

DOI: 10.1016/J.CCA.2016.05.003

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Background Pre-analytical errors necessitate specimen rejection and negatively affect patient safety. Our purpose was to investigate the factors leading its impact. Methods Specimen rejections in a clinical chemistry laboratory during 1-year period were reviewed retrospectively analyzed for frequency, cause, circumstances, Results Of 837,862 specimens received, 2178 (0.26%) rejected. The most common reasons contamination ( n  = 764, 35.1%), inappropriate collection container/tube  = 330, 15.2%), quantity not sufficient (QNS)  = 329, 15.1%), labeling  = 321, 14.7%), hemolyzed  = 205, 9.4%), clotted  = 203, 9.3%). analytes often affected glucose  = 192, 8.8%); calcium  = 152, 7.0%), magnesium  = 148, 6.8%), potassium  = 137, 6.3%), creatinine  = 100, 4.6%), blood urea nitrogen  = 97, 4.4%). Outpatient service draw by phlebotomists associated with low rates (536/493,501 or 0.11% 368/586,503 0.06%, respectively). Recollection due increased turnaround time an average of 108 min. total cost recollection around $43,210 USD $21.9 USD. Conclusions are remediable improved training quality assurance measures. Policies procedures specific collection, transportation, preparation should be strictly followed.

参考文章(30)
Robert C Hawkins, Laboratory turnaround time. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 28, pp. 179- 194 ,(2007)
D J Krogstad, G G Granich, P R Murray, M A Pfaller, R Valdes, Heparin interferes with the radioenzymatic and homogeneous enzyme immunoassays for aminoglycosides. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 28, pp. 1517- 1521 ,(1982) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/28.7.1517
Raouf E. Nakhleh, Molly K. Walsh, Leonas G. Bekeris, Paul N. Valenstein, Bruce A. Jones, Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 138 institutions. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 133, pp. 38- 43 ,(2009) , 10.1043/1543-2165-133.1.38
Elizabeth A. Wagar, Molly K. Walsh, Ana K. Stankovic, Raouf E. Nakhleh, Stephen Raab, Specimen Labeling Errors: A Q-Probes Analysis of 147 Clinical Laboratories Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 132, pp. 1617- 1622 ,(2008) , 10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1617:SLEAQA]2.0.CO;2
Vivek Bhat, Manikchandra Tiwari, Preeti Chavan, Rohini Kelkar, Analysis of laboratory sample rejections in the pre-analytical stage at an oncology center Clinica Chimica Acta. ,vol. 413, pp. 1203- 1206 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.CCA.2012.03.024
Julie K. Kim, Bert Dotson, Sean Thomas, Kelly C. Nelson, Standardized patient identification and specimen labeling: A retrospective analysis on improving patient safety Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 68, pp. 53- 56 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JAAD.2012.06.017
Donald S. Karcher, Christopher M. Lehman, Clinical Consequences of Specimen Rejection: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Analysis of 78 Clinical Laboratories Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. ,vol. 138, pp. 1003- 1008 ,(2014) , 10.5858/ARPA.2013-0331-CP