Does recovery planning improve the status of threatened species

作者: Madeleine C Bottrill , Jessica C Walsh , James EM Watson , Liana N Joseph , Alejandro Ortega-Argueta

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.02.008

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Recovery planning is a key component of government-funded initiatives to address declining populations threatened species. To date, there has been limited retrospective evaluation on the impact recovery plans, despite an increasing interest in evaluating motivated by demands for greater accountability and shift away from single-species focused strategies multi-species, landscape ecosystem-based plans. In context species management Australia, we aimed investigate whether listed with plans are more likely have improved their status compared without Since 1999, over 600 draft approved developed than 850 1663 currently Australia. We applied novel econometric matching analysis reduce biases associated non-random selection listing planning. found that presence or absence plan did not statistically significant effect species’ was improving, stable declining. The result suggests may be useful short term uncertainty persists about they make long contribution recovery. One major contributing factor lack basic accounting efforts. This limits our ability refute confirm status, potential public confidence government expenditures. Better systems reporting therefore required promote transparency, improve existing knowledge facilitate efficient investments future actions.

参考文章(32)
J. Baxter, C. A. Galbraith, Species management: challenges and solutions for the 21st century. Species management: challenges and solutions for the 21st century.. ,(2010)
Susan Wooller, Susan A Moore, Review of landscape, multi - and single species recovery planning for threatened species Moore, S.A. <http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/view/author/Moore, Susan.html> and Wooller, S. <http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/view/author/Wooller, Susan.html> (2003) Review of landscape, multi - and single species recovery planning for threatened species. A project undertaken for WWF Australia. ,(2003)
Michael J. Crawley, Statistics : An Introduction Using R ,(2005)
Metrick, Andrew Weitzman, Martin L., Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation Land Economics. ,vol. 72, pp. 1- 16 ,(1994)
Liana N. Joseph, Richard F. Maloney, Shaun M. O’connor, Pam Cromarty, Paul Jansen, Theo Stephens, Hugh P. Possingham, Improving methods for allocating resources among threatened species: the case for a new national approach in New Zealand. Pacific Conservation Biology. ,vol. 14, pp. 154- 158 ,(2008) , 10.1071/PC080154
Clem Tisdell, Clevo Wilson, Hemanath Swarna Nantha, Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability Anthrozoos. ,vol. 18, pp. 160- 174 ,(2005) , 10.2752/089279305785594216
Berta Martín-López, Carlos Montes, Lucía Ramírez, Javier Benayas, What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 1370- 1380 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2009.01.030
Clem Tisdell, Hemanath Swarna Nantha, Clevo Wilson, Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: How important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecological Economics. ,vol. 60, pp. 627- 633 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2006.01.007