Nevada's experience with the Renewable Portfolio Standard

作者: Valerie Rountree

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2019.02.010

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is widely considered the most important state-level renewable energy policy in U.S. RPS policies are designed to move state's electric sector toward renewables while minimizing electricity cost increases for customers but specific design elements vary from state state. And yet, impacts of features on outcomes has received relatively little attention scholarly research. This study employs an in-depth case approach examine stakeholder perceptions how and why particular Nevada's have changed as result social political dynamics perceived these changes outcomes. Although expert stakeholders early critical spurring growth renewables, addition a credit multiplier allowance existing out-of-state resources, long-term banking RECs, credits used operate geothermal facilities, efficiency measures were viewed undermining objectives delocalizing economic environmental benefits. Stakeholders electric-sector culture that resistant change single, powerful utility significant sway over its regulator.

参考文章(55)
Oguzhan Dincer, James E. Payne, Kristi Simkins, Are State Renewable Portfolio Standards Contagious? American Journal of Economics and Sociology. ,vol. 73, pp. 325- 340 ,(2014) , 10.1111/AJES.12073
Sanya Carley, Chris J. Miller, Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards Policy Studies Journal. ,vol. 40, pp. 730- 756 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1541-0072.2012.00471.X
Galen Barbose, Lori Bird, Jenny Heeter, Francisco Flores-Espino, Ryan Wiser, Costs and Benefits of Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 52, pp. 523- 533 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2015.07.175
Gireesh Shrimali, Gabriel Chan, Steffen Jenner, Felix Groba, Joe Indvik, Evaluating renewable portfolio standards for in-state renewable deployment: Accounting for policy heterogeneity Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy. ,vol. 4, pp. 127- 142 ,(2015) , 10.5547/2160-5890.4.2.GSHR
Jonathan Bendor, Terry M. Moe, An Adaptive Model of Bureaucratic Politics American Political Science Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 755- 774 ,(1985) , 10.2307/1956842