A guide to rational dosing of monoclonal antibodies.

作者: Shuang Bai , Karin Jorga , Yan Xin , Denise Jin , Yanan Zheng

DOI: 10.2165/11596370-000000000-00000

关键词:

摘要: Dosing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is often based on body size, with the perception that size-based dosing would reduce inter-subject variability in drug exposure. However, most mAbs are target specific a relatively large window and generally small contribution size to pharmacokinetic variability. Therefore, paradigm for should be assessed context these unique characteristics. The objective this study was review current strategy provide scientific rationale using modelling simulation approach. In analysis, weight-based or weight-independent (fixed) regimens were systematically evaluated. A generic two-compartment first-order elimination model developed. Individual population profiles simulated as function weight effects clearance (θbw_cl) central volume distribution (θbw_vl). exposure (the area under serum concentration-time curve [AUC], trough concentration [Cmin] peak [Cmax]) compared between fixed entire population. deviation light heavy subjects from median also measured. results then evaluated clinical characteristics various given either by case study. Results analysis demonstrated dependent magnitude effect pharmacokinetics. contrast conventional assumption, does not always offer advantages over reducing general, when exponential functions θbw_cl θbw_vl 0.5, less than dosing. scenarios >0.5, impact different each measure. had little moderate (θbw_cl <0.5 ∼0.5). difference 20% percentages subpopulations 40%. provided insights into conditions which superior differences across introduced regimen relative observed pharmacodynamics, efficacy safety. mAb can flexible. Given many practical advantages, recommended first option first-in-human studies mAbs. later stages development could determined combined knowledge pharmacokinetics, safety early trials.

参考文章(34)
Donald E. Mager, William J. Jusko, General pharmacokinetic model for drugs exhibiting target-mediated drug disposition. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. ,vol. 28, pp. 507- 532 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1014414520282
Rong Deng, Suhasini Iyer, Frank-Peter Theil, Deborah L. Mortensen, Paul J. Fielder, Saileta Prabhu, Projecting human pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies from nonclinical data: what have we learned? mAbs. ,vol. 3, pp. 61- 66 ,(2011) , 10.4161/MABS.3.1.13799
John M Kovarik, Björn Nashan, Peter Neuhaus, Pierre‐Alain Clavien, Christophe Gerbeau, Michael L Hall, Alexander Korn, A population pharmacokinetic screen to identify demographic-clinical covariates of basiliximab in liver transplantation Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 69, pp. 201- 209 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MCP.2001.114887
Iftekhar Mahmood, Pharmacokinetic Allometric Scaling of Antibodies: Application to the First-In-Human Dose Estimation Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. ,vol. 98, pp. 3850- 3861 ,(2009) , 10.1002/JPS.21682
Yaowei Zhu, Chuanpu Hu, Ming Lu, Sam Liao, Joseph C. Marini, Jennifer Yohrling, Newman Yeilding, Hugh M. Davis, Honghui Zhou, Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Ustekinumab, a Human Monoclonal Antibody Targeting IL-12/23p40, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 49, pp. 162- 175 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0091270008329556
Naoto Hayashi, Yuko Tsukamoto, William M. Sallas, Philip J. Lowe, A mechanism-based binding model for the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omalizumab. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 63, pp. 548- 561 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-2125.2006.02803.X
Diane D. Wang, Shuzhong Zhang, Hong Zhao, Angela Y. Men, Kourosh Parivar, Fixed dosing versus body size-based dosing of monoclonal antibodies in adult clinical trials. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 49, pp. 1012- 1024 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0091270009337512
Chee M. Ng, Bert L. Lum, Veronica Gimenez, Steve Kelsey, David Allison, Rationale for Fixed Dosing of Pertuzumab in Cancer Patients Based on Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Pharmaceutical Research. ,vol. 23, pp. 1275- 1284 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11095-006-0205-X