Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed

作者: Edward E. Wallach , George R. Huggins , Steven J. Sondheimer

DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47709-5

关键词:

摘要: Surgical sterilization in women has changed dramatically over the past 20 years. The development of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy have made procedure readily available even developing countries. In United States, changing social values changes hospital regulations done as much technology to account for tremendous increases number undergoing sterilization. Improved procedures resulted lower costs lowered morbidity mortality rates. Hysterectomy alone carries unacceptable Originally, laparoscopic techniques utilized unipolar cautery. However, bowel burns, a rare but serious complication, were reported, this led newer techniques. These techniques, using bands, clips, bipolar cautery, gained increasing popularity eliminated many complications female Historically, there been concern that tubal by any method produces, significant numbers patients, subsequent gynecologic psychologic problems called "post-tubal ligation syndrome." A review earlier literature indicates these studies methodologic problems, including recall bias, inappropriate control groups, failure elicit prior history or use oral contraceptives IUDs. More recent large prospective epidemiologic controlled contraceptive usage failed show increased incidence sequelae women. are some data support concept certain individuals, may result disruption ovarian blood nerve supply, producing sequelae. Additional from ongoing large-scale others should help elucidate problem future. Pregnancy after (even excluding pregnancies present at time procedure) is more common first year with risk decreasing years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

参考文章(58)
J. M. Kasonde, J. Bonnar, EFFECT OF STERILIZATION ON MENSTRUAL BLOOD LOSS British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 83, pp. 572- 575 ,(1976) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1976.TB00888.X
Tubal sterilization: findings in a large prospective study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 90, pp. 203- 209 ,(1983) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1983.TB08609.X
Lidia M. Rubinstein, Thomas B. Lebherz, Vicki Kleinkopf, Laparoscopic tubal sterilization: Long-term postoperative follow-up Contraception. ,vol. 13, pp. 631- 638 ,(1976) , 10.1016/0010-7824(76)90018-4
MICHAEL S. BAGGISH, WING K. LEE, STUART J. MIRO, LENIA DACKO, GARY COHEN, Complications of laparoscopic sterilization. Comparison of 2 methods. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 54, pp. 54- 59 ,(1979) , 10.1097/00006250-197907000-00014
T. C. Stevenson, ABDOMINAL STERILIZATION USING THE PROCTOSCOPE BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 78, pp. 273- 276 ,(1971) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1971.TB00268.X
John Murray, A Review of Women Requesting Reversal of Tubal Sterilization The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 20, pp. 211- 213 ,(1980) , 10.1111/J.1479-828X.1980.TB00767.X
T. Lind, D.J. Taylor, A MODIFIED LARYNGOSCOPE FOR FEMALI STERILISATION The Lancet. ,vol. 308, pp. 347- ,(1976) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92599-X
MARGUERITE K. SHEPARD, Female contraceptive sterilization. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. ,vol. 29, pp. 739- 787 ,(1974) , 10.1097/00006254-197411000-00001
M. J. Muldoon, Gynaecological Illness after Sterilization BMJ. ,vol. 1, pp. 84- 85 ,(1972) , 10.1136/BMJ.1.5792.84