A Textual Comparison of British and American Writing

作者: Douglas Biber

DOI: 10.2307/455273

关键词:

摘要: M ANY AMERICANS REGARD BRITISH ENGLISH as more formal and proper than American English, while the British in turn consider English to be markedly informal relaxed. Observers commonly attribute these attitudes differences pronunciation, which are most readily apparent distinctions between two dialects. Correspondingly, nearly all linguistic comparisons of have focussed on phonological features relatively idiosyncratic vocabulary differences. Syntactic varieties been largely ignored. The present study begins fill this gap: it identifies systematic syntactic writing, suggests that associated with differing functional priorities. compares nine written genres (e.g., press reportage, academic prose, romantic fiction) respect three underlying parameters variation (identified earlier studies). Based their interpretations, tentatively labelled Dimension 1: INTERACTIVE versus EDITED TEXT; 2: ABSTRACT Versus SITUATED CONTENT; 3: REPORTED IMMEDIATE STYLE. (These interpretations described section II.) shows there writing first dimensions. When compared along 1, is found consistently edited less interactive corresponding genres; 2, abstract genres. Although not large, they highly across different genres, indicating truly represent texts. both dimensions greater attention grammatical stylistic prescriptions writing. discussion organized follows: I, some previous described; II

参考文章(18)
Geoffrey N. Leech, Johansson. Stig, Helen Goodluck, Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo : Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computers Department of English, University of Oslo. ,(1978)
Phillip C. Boardman, Charlton Grant Laird, The Legacy of language : a tribute to Charlton Laird University of Nevada Press. ,(1987)
PAUL KAY, Language Evolution and Speech Style Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Change. pp. 21- 33 ,(1977) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-107450-0.50008-5
Kazuo Kato, Ronald R. Butters, American Instances of Propredicate Do Journal of English Linguistics. ,vol. 20, pp. 212- 216 ,(1987) , 10.1177/007542428702000205
Millicent E. Poole, T.W. Field, A comparison of oral and written code elaboration. Language and Speech. ,vol. 19, pp. 305- 312 ,(1976) , 10.1177/002383097601900401
John Joseph Gumperz, Ben G. Blount, Mary Sanches, Sociocultural dimensions of language change ,(1977)
George L. Dillon, Deborah Tannen, Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy Language. ,vol. 60, pp. 441- ,(1984) , 10.2307/413655