Rise and Fall - or Transformation?

作者: William Ocasio , John Joseph

DOI: 10.1016/J.LRP.2008.02.010

关键词:

摘要: We challenge conventional accounts of the rise and fall strategic planning by examining history evolution practices at General Electric Company (GE) during six CEO regimes: Wilson, Cordiner, Borch, Jones, Welch Immelt. distinguish — a system strategy formulation, decision making control from particular technologies such as SBU planning. show how an integrative was first established in GE 1950s continues, albeit transformed, to this day. Integrative originally called long range , later after abandonment planning, GE'S Operating System, but changes use labels mask continuities prevailing practices. The has several implications for contemporary making: first, practice cannot remain static must evolve facilitate corporate agenda management style. Second, CEO's involvement design is critical its endurance centrality. Third, specialized governance channels decision-making communications focus attention executives on distinct, yet critical, tasks shape agenda. Finally, tight coupling information communication flows across overall integration effectiveness system.

参考文章(38)
William P. Ocasio, John Joseph, Governance Channels and Organizational Design at General Electric: 1950–2001 Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 267- 284 ,(2006) , 10.1007/0-387-34173-0_14
Richard T. Pascale, Managing on the Edge ,(1990)
Karl E. Weick, Sensemaking in organizations ,(1995)
Nicolas S. Majluf, Arnoldo C. Hax, Strategic Management: An Integrative Perspective ,(1984)
Francis Joseph Aguilar, General Managers in Action ,(1987)
Lynn Harold Vogel, Irma Patterson, Strategy and Structure Administration in Social Work. ,vol. 10, pp. 53- 66 ,(1986) , 10.1300/J147V10N02_05
Richard Whittington, What Is Strategy and Does It Matter ,(1998)