Reproducible research in the study of biological coloration

作者: Thomas E. White , Rhiannon L. Dalrymple , Daniel W.A. Noble , James C. O'Hanlon , Daniel B. Zurek

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2015.05.007

关键词:

摘要: The study of colour in nature has generated insights intofundamental evolutionary and ecological processes, researchinto traits is a rapidly growing field (Kelber & Osorio, 2010).Theongoinginterestinbiologicalcolorationhasinpartbeendrivenby the increased availability key technologies, including spec-trometry photography, concurrent advances methodsfor analysing data, such as visual models (e.g. Endler M Kelber, Vorobyev, 2003; Stevens, Parraga,Cuthill, Partridge, Troscianko, 2007). While these developmentsare positive for field, increasingly complex analyses beingrun on ever greater amounts data heighten need forcomprehensive methods reporting diligent management(Alsheikh-Ali, Qureshi, Al-Mallah, Ioannidis, 2011; Nekrutenko T Van Noorden, Whitlock, 2011). Astudy may be considered truly reproducible when it satisfies threebroad criteria: (1) are reported completely, (2) arepubliclyavailable archived,and (3) chain modification ofraw documented preserved. completely repro-ducible research FitzJohn et al., 2014) laudable goal, theconsiderable demands imposes researchers means that willoften, practice, unattainable. Nevertheless, even partialreproducibility through relatively simple practices completemethodsreportingandpublicdataarchivingisoftremendousvalue.Our aim was to explore state reproducibility studyofbiological coloration, suggest simpleways inwhich maybe improved. We first outline common studying bio-logical coloration present guidelines comprehensivemethods reporting. then how well some theseimportant criteria have been literature. alsoquantify publicly archived code andsuggest useful tools increasing ofcolour trait more broadly.

参考文章(48)
Marc Théry, Doris Gomez, Insect Colours and Visual Appearance in the Eyes of Their Predators Advances in Insect Physiology. ,vol. 38, pp. 267- 353 ,(2010) , 10.1016/S0065-2806(10)38001-5
Rhiannon L. Dalrymple, Francis K. C. Hui, Habacuc Flores-Moreno, Darrell J. Kemp, Angela T. Moles, Roses are red, violets are blue – so how much replication should you do? An assessment of variation in the colour of flowers and birds Biological Journal of The Linnean Society. ,vol. 114, pp. 69- 81 ,(2015) , 10.1111/BIJ.12402
MARTIN STEVENS, C. ALEJANDRO PÁRRAGA, INNES C. CUTHILL, JULIAN C. PARTRIDGE, TOM S TROSCIANKO, Using digital photography to study animal coloration Biological Journal of The Linnean Society. ,vol. 90, pp. 211- 237 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1095-8312.2007.00725.X
JOHN A. ENDLER, PAUL W. MIELKE, Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them Biological Journal of The Linnean Society. ,vol. 86, pp. 405- 431 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1095-8312.2005.00540.X
Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, None, Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 13, pp. 667- 672 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NRG3305
Rafael Maia, Chad M. Eliason, Pierre-Paul Bitton, Stéphanie M. Doucet, Matthew D. Shawkey, pavo : an R package for the analysis, visualization and organization of spectral data Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 4, pp. 906- 913 ,(2013) , 10.1111/2041-210X.12069
Daniel S. Caetano, Anita Aisenberg, Forgotten treasures: the fate of data in animal behaviour studies Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 98, pp. 1- 5 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2014.09.025