摘要: The 20 century offered opportunities for rapid natural resource-based growth that Latin America systematically missed. Even if it were the case resource abundant countries have experienced relatively slow growth, more interesting question is why some -Australia, and Sweden example -successfully rapidly developed while others did not. America’s underperformance, its particularly virulent strain of dependency, are in substantial measure due to impediments technological adoption innovation arising from weak national “learning” capacity, perverse incentives protectionist era.
worldbank.org参考文章(70)
L. S. Jarvis, J. R. Anderson, Changing private and public roles in technological development: lessons from the Chilean fruit sector. Changing private and public roles in technological development: lessons from the Chilean fruit sector.. pp. 243- 266 ,(1994)
David S. Landes, Denis Clerc, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations L'Économie politique. pp. 107- 112 ,(2001)
Ian Warwick McLean, Rodney Maddock, The Australian economy in the long run Cambridge University Press. ,(1987)
Harold Adams Innis, Problems of staple production in Canada Ryerson Press. ,(1933)
Tim Duncan, John Fogarty, Australia and Argentina on Parallel Paths ,(1986)
Riitta Hjerppe, The Finnish economy 1860-1985: Growth and structural change ,(1989)
Göran Ahlström, Technical competence and industrial performance : Sweden in the 19th and early 20th centuries Department of Economic History, Lund University. ,(1992)
Joseph Ramos, A development strategy founded on natural resource-based production clusters CEPAL Review. ,vol. 1998, pp. 105- 127 ,(1998) , 10.18356/1707AC87-EN
Gene M. Grossman, Elhanan Helpman, Innovation and growth in the global economy ,(1991)