Tinkering with the Machinery of Death: An Analysis of Juror Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials During Two Statutory Eras

作者: Elizabeth S. Vartkessian , Jon R. Sorensen , Christopher E. Kelly

DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2014.958188

关键词:

摘要: The Texas death penalty statute originally approved by the United States Supreme Court in Jurek v. (1976) was legislatively amended as a result of Court’s decision Penry Lynaugh (1989). changes were intended to focus on increasing jurors’ ability give mitigating effect evidence sentencing. Using data from Capital Jury Project, we compared juror comprehension sentencing guidelines, punishment responsibility, and deliberations among sample 123 jurors who deliberated under statutes. In each area, found that failed guide capital decision-making intended.

参考文章(34)
Benjamin D. Steiner, William J. Bowers, Death by Default: An Empirical Demonstration of False and Forced Choices in Capital Sentencing Texas Law Review. ,vol. 77, pp. 605- ,(1999)
Benjamin D. Steiner, Marla Sandys, William J. Bowers, Foreclosed Impartiality in Capital Sentencing: Jurors’ Predispositions Guilt-Trial Experience and Premature Decision Making Cornell Law Review. ,vol. 83, pp. 1476- 1821 ,(1998)
Stephen P. Garvey, John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson, Future Dangerousness in Capital Cases: Always "At Issue" Cornell Law Review. ,vol. 86, pp. 397- ,(2001)
Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T Wells, Stephen P. Garvey, Jury Responsibility in Capital Sentencing: An Empirical Study Buffalo Law Review. ,vol. 44, pp. 339- ,(1996)
James Luginbuhl, Julie Howe, Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided? Indiana Law Journal. ,vol. 70, pp. 5- ,(1995)
William J. Bowers, The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, and Preview of Early Findings Indiana Law Journal. ,vol. 70, pp. 2- ,(1995)
Joseph L. Hoffman, Where's the Buck?: Juror Misperception of Sentencing Responsibility in Death Penalty Cases Indiana Law Journal. ,vol. 70, pp. 4- ,(1995)
Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells, Deadly Confusion: Juror Instructions in Capital Cases Cornell Law Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 1- 1682 ,(1993)
Katie Morgan, Michael J. Zydney Mannheimer, The Impact of Information Overload on the Capital Jury's Ability to Assess Aggravating and Mitigating Factors William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal. ,vol. 17, pp. 1089- ,(2009)
Theodore Eisenberg, Martin T. Wells, Stephen P. Garvey, But Was He Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Capital Sentencing Cornell Law Review. ,vol. 83, pp. 1599- 1821 ,(1998)