Using native and invasive populations as surrogate 'species' to predict the potential for native and invasive populations to shift their range

作者: Jane Molofsky , A. Robin Collins

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Background: The wetland grass, Phalaris arundinacea, is invasive in North America but native to Europe. Aim: Compare experimentally how a species and an may respond changing environmental conditions. Methods: Sample both populations from near the centre margin of their ranges. Native, centre: Czech Republic; native, range margin: Mediterranean France; invasive, Vermont; Carolina. Use 18 genotypes P. arundinacea. Plant them into four common gardens along latitudinal gradient eastern USA (Vermont, Carolina, Georgia, Florida). Measure mean phenotypic traits, plasticity, genetic variances each garden. Results: plants grew best Carolina garden, where are larger, taller, produce more tillers than counterparts. But these differences did not appear other gardens. In addition, although we predicted higher plasticity for genotypes, found only modest between genotypes. Populations growing close presumed ideal conditions (as measured by plant biomass) have similar relatively high variances. Thus, under favourable greatest potential evolve response However, became stressful defined mortality), southern marginal individuals (North Carolina) showed (Mediterranean France). Conclusions: When confronted with new environment, at had evolutionary populations.

参考文章(35)
S. R. KELLER, D. R. TAYLOR, Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 23, pp. 1720- 1731 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2010.02037.X
Francis F. Kilkenny, Laura F. Galloway, ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE AT THE MARGIN OF AN INVADED RANGE Evolution. ,vol. 67, pp. 722- 731 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2012.01829.X
S. ARNAUD-HAOND, S. TEIXEIRA, S. I. MASSA, C. BILLOT, P. SAENGER, G. COUPLAND, C. M. DUARTE, E. A. SERRÃO, Genetic structure at range edge: Low diversity and high inbreeding in Southeast Asian mangrove (Avicennia marina) populations Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 15, pp. 3515- 3525 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2006.02997.X
CARL D. SCHLICHTING, Phenotypic plasticity in plants Plant Species Biology. ,vol. 17, pp. 85- 88 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1442-1984.2002.00083.X
M. Pigliucci, C. D. Schlichting, Reaction norms ofArabidopsis. V. Flowering time controls phenotypic architecture in response to nutrient stress Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. 285- 301 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1420-9101.1998.11030285.X
Benjamin G. Miner, Sonia E. Sultan, Steven G. Morgan, Dianna K. Padilla, Rick A. Relyea, Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 20, pp. 685- 692 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2005.08.002
Anna L. Dietrich, Christer Nilsson, Roland Jansson, Phytometers are underutilised for evaluating ecological restoration Basic and Applied Ecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 369- 377 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BAAE.2013.05.008
Nicolas Salamin, Rafael O. Wüest, Sébastien Lavergne, Wilfried Thuiller, Peter B. Pearman, Assessing rapid evolution in a changing environment Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 25, pp. 692- 698 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2010.09.009