Assessing the simulated soil hydrothermal regime of the active layer from the Noah-MP land surface model (v1.1) in the permafrost regions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

作者: Tonghua Wu , Yongping Qiao , Guojie Hu , Jie Chen , Xiaofan Zhu

DOI: 10.5194/GMD-14-1753-2021

关键词:

摘要: Abstract. Extensive and rigorous model intercomparison is of great importance before application due to the uncertainties in current land surface models (LSMs). Without considering forcing data and parameters, this study designed an ensemble 55 296 experiments to evaluate Noah LSM with multi-parameterization (Noah-MP) for snow cover events (SCEs), soil temperature (ST) soil liquid water (SLW) simulation, investigated sensitivity of parameterization schemes at a typical permafrost site on Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP). The results showed that Noah-MP systematically overestimates snow cover, which could be greatly resolved when adopting sublimation from wind semi-implicit snow/soil time scheme. As result the overestimated snow, generally underestimates ST, mostly influenced by process. A systematic cold bias large uncertainties in remain after eliminating effects snow, particularly deep layers during season. combination of roughness length heat under-canopy (below-canopy) aerodynamic resistance contributes resolving temperature. In addition, Noah-MP top SLW. runoff groundwater (RUN) process dominates SLW simulation comparison very limited impacts all other physical processes. analysis structural and characteristics each scheme would constructive better understanding land surface processes regions the QTP as well further improvements towards hydrothermal regime modeling using LSMs.

参考文章(72)
DANIEL HILLEL, 1 – The Task of Soil Physics Fundamentals of Soil Physics. pp. 3- 5 ,(1980) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-091870-9.50006-6
Miaogen Shen, Shilong Piao, Su-Jong Jeong, Liming Zhou, Zhenzhong Zeng, Philippe Ciais, Deliang Chen, Mengtian Huang, Chun-Sil Jin, Laurent Z. X. Li, Yue Li, Ranga B. Myneni, Kun Yang, Gengxin Zhang, Yangjian Zhang, Tandong Yao, Evaporative cooling over the Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 112, pp. 9299- 9304 ,(2015) , 10.1073/PNAS.1504418112
SQ (罗斯琼) Luo, YM (马耀明) Ma, SS (李锁锁) Li, LY (尚伦宇) Shang, Y (张宇) Zhang, ZY (胡泽勇) Hu, SH (吕世华) Lu, Soil thermal conductivity parameterization establishment and application in numerical model of central Tibetan Plateau Chinese Journal of Geophysics. ,vol. 52, ,(2009)
S. Westermann, M. Langer, J. Boike, M. Heikenfeld, M. Peter, B. Etzelmüller, G. Krinner, Simulating the thermal regime and thaw processes of ice-rich permafrost ground with the land-surface model CryoGrid 3 Geoscientific Model Development. ,vol. 9, pp. 523- 546 ,(2016) , 10.5194/GMD-9-523-2016
Donglin Guo, Huijun Wang, Simulation of permafrost and seasonally frozen ground conditions on the Tibetan Plateau, 1981-2010 Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 118, pp. 5216- 5230 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JGRD.50457
Ally M. Toure, Matthew Rodell, Zong-Liang Yang, Hiroko Beaudoing, Edward Kim, Yongfei Zhang, Yonghwan Kwon, Evaluation of the Snow Simulations from the Community Land Model, Version 4 (CLM4) Journal of Hydrometeorology. ,vol. 17, pp. 153- 170 ,(2016) , 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0165.1
Guo‐Yue Niu, Zong‐Liang Yang, None, Effects of vegetation canopy processes on snow surface energy and mass balances Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 109, pp. 1- 15 ,(2004) , 10.1029/2004JD004884
Kun Yang, Toshio Koike, Hirohiko Ishikawa, Joon Kim, Xin Li, Huizhi Liu, Shaomin Liu, Yaoming Ma, Jieming Wang, Turbulent flux transfer over bare-soil surfaces: Characteristics and parameterization Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. ,vol. 47, pp. 276- 290 ,(2008) , 10.1175/2007JAMC1547.1
Kun Yang, Toshio Koike, Baisheng Ye, Luis Bastidas, Inverse analysis of the role of soil vertical heterogeneity in controlling surface soil state and energy partition Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 110, ,(2005) , 10.1029/2004JD005500
Yoav Benjamini, Simultaneous and selective inference: Current successes and future challenges Biometrical Journal. ,vol. 52, pp. 708- 721 ,(2010) , 10.1002/BIMJ.200900299