What do these clinical trial results mean? How product efficacy judgments are affected by data partitioning, framing, and quantification

作者: Dipayan Biswas , Cornelia Pechmann

DOI: 10.1016/J.OBHDP.2011.11.007

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Organizations often present data related to clinical trials, and other product efficacy information, in partitioned or aggregated formats, as successes failures, frequencies percentages. We examine how such different presentation formats might interact influence judgments. The results of five experiments indicate that (vs. aggregated) frequency affect judgments regarding perceived these effects are moderated by frames (success vs. failure) quantification (frequencies percentages). Specifically, success-framed, partitioned, enhance choice, while failure-framed, have the opposite effects. However, get attenuated when presented

参考文章(46)
Ellen Peters, Irwin P. Levin, Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making. ,vol. 3, pp. 435- 448 ,(2008)
Alice H. Eagly, Akiva Liberman, Shelly Chaiken, Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. Unintended Thought. pp. 212- 252 ,(1989)
David M. Sanbonmatsu, Steven S. Posavac, Randon Stasney, The Subjective Beliefs Underlying Probability Overestimation Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 33, pp. 276- 295 ,(1997) , 10.1006/JESP.1996.1321
Craig R. M. McKenzie, Taking into account the strength of an alternative hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 24, pp. 771- 792 ,(1998) , 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.771
B.W. Pelham, T.T. Sumarta, L. Myaskovsky, The Easy Path From Many To Much: the Numerosity Heuristic Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 103- 133 ,(1994) , 10.1006/COGP.1994.1004
Stephen J. Hoch, Young-Won Ha, Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience Journal of Consumer Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 221- 233 ,(1986) , 10.1086/209062
William Boulding, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, The Quality Double Whammy Marketing Science. ,vol. 18, pp. 463- 484 ,(1999) , 10.1287/MKSC.18.4.463
Robin M Hogarth, Hillel J Einhorn, None, Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1- 55 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-J
Ian M. Dobbs, A Bayesian approach to decision-making under ambiguity Economica. ,vol. 58, pp. 417- 440 ,(1991) , 10.2307/2554690