Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research

作者: Thomas W. Sanchez

DOI: 10.17645/UP.V6I1.4135

关键词:

摘要: Urban planning is characterized by involving a wide range of experts from variety fields. Therefore, research draws upon each these fields in how it interprets an examines the natural and built environment as elements human settlement activities. As small professional academic discipline incorporating aspects design, policy, law, social sciences, engineering, understandable that outcomes are published broad outlets. It useful for us to reflect on our intentions, processes, outcomes, which also referred ‘research about research,’ with focus scholarly products urban academics. We can do this examining methodologies, subdomains, application practice, impact, bibliometrics. The purpose reflecting helps better understand processes resulting body scholarship whole.

参考文章(16)
Horst W. J. Rittel, Melvin M. Webber, Dilemmas in a general theory of planning Policy Sciences. ,vol. 4, pp. 155- 169 ,(1973) , 10.1007/BF01405730
Mary M. Edwards, Lisa K. Bates, Planning’s Core Curriculum: Knowledge, Practice, and Implementation Journal of Planning Education and Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 172- 183 ,(2011) , 10.1177/0739456X11398043
Aaron Wildavsky, If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing Policy Sciences. ,vol. 4, pp. 127- 153 ,(1973) , 10.1007/BF01405729
John Friedmann, The Core Curriculum in Planning Revisited Journal of Planning Education and Research. ,vol. 15, pp. 89- 104 ,(1996) , 10.1177/0739456X9601500202
David Wadley, Philip Smith, If planning is about anything, what is it about? International Journal of Social Economics. ,vol. 25, pp. 1005- 1029 ,(1998) , 10.1108/03068299810212414
Simin Davoudi, John Pendlebury, Centenary paper: The evolution of planning as an academic discipline Town Planning Review. ,vol. 81, pp. 613- 646 ,(2010) , 10.3828/TPR.2010.24
Richard E. Klosterman, Arguments for and against planning Town Planning Review. ,vol. 56, pp. 5- ,(1985) , 10.3828/TPR.56.1.E8286Q3082111KM4
Ernest R. Alexander, If Planning isn't Everything, Maybe it's Something Town Planning Review. ,vol. 52, pp. 131- ,(1981) , 10.3828/TPR.52.2.X34435M0X5555454
Eric Reade, If Planning isn't Everything... A Comment Town Planning Review. ,vol. 53, pp. 65- ,(1982) , 10.3828/TPR.53.1.61363L0G33910226
Thomas W. Sanchez, Nader Afzalan, Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Urban Planning Social Science Research Network. pp. 69- 84 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9781315308715-6