Surface replacement: A viable option for the right patient
作者： Edwin P. Su , Sherwin L. Su
DOI: 10.1053/J.SART.2015.04.002
关键词:
摘要: Surface replacement of the hip was established in 1970s as a bone preserving alternative to total replacement. However, problems with femoral neck fracture, osteolysis, and component loosening led early failures an abandonment procedure. The modern resurfacing has improved upon past results new implant designs materials. benefits include preservation bone, lower dislocation rate, more physiologic loading, factors which may lead ability for higher activity level. National joint registry find that certain group patients greater survivorship than Therefore, we believe surface arthroplasty is viable this subgroup patients.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(30)
Gulraj S. Matharu, Callum W. McBryde, Matthew P. Revell, Paul B. Pynsent, Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision. Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 28, pp. 147- 153 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2012.04.035
Richard Lass, Alexander Grübl, Alexander Kolb, David Stelzeneder, Alexander Pilger, Bernd Kubista, Alexander Giurea, Reinhard Windhager, Comparison of synovial fluid, urine, and serum ion levels in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 18 years Journal of Orthopaedic Research. ,vol. 32, pp. 1234- 1240 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JOR.22652
Edwin P. Su, Michael Sheehan, Sherwin L. Su, Comparison of Bone Removed During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Resurfacing or Conventional Femoral Component The Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 25, pp. 325- 329 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2008.10.004
Adele W. Miccio, Clinical Problem Solving American Journal of Speech-language Pathology. ,vol. 11, pp. 221- 229 ,(2002) , 10.1044/1058-0360(2002/023)
Edward T. Davis, Michael Olsen, Rad Zdero, Gemma M. Smith, James P. Waddell, Emil H. Schemitsch, Predictors of femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: a cadaveric study. Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 28, pp. 110- 116 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ARTH.2012.05.015
Dalila De Pasquale, Susanna Stea, Stefano Squarzoni, Barbara Bordini, Marilina Amabile, Simona Catalani, Pietro Apostoli, Aldo Toni, Metal-on-metal hip prostheses: Correlation between debris in the synovial fluid and levels of cobalt and chromium ions in the bloodstream International Orthopaedics. ,vol. 38, pp. 469- 475 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00264-013-2137-5
A.P. Davies, H.G. Willert, P.A. Campbell, I.D. Learmonth, C.P. Case, An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 87, pp. 18- 27 ,(2005) , 10.2106/JBJS.C.00949
Deborah A. Marshall, Karen Pykerman, Jason Werle, Diane Lorenzetti, Tracy Wasylak, Tom Noseworthy, Donald A. Dick, Greg O’Connor, Aish Sundaram, Sanne Heintzbergen, Cy Frank, Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 472, pp. 2217- 2230 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11999-014-3556-3
Harlan C. Amstutz, Michel J. Le Duff, Alicia J. Johnson, Socket Position Determines Hip Resurfacing 10-Year Survivorship Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 470, pp. 3127- 3133 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11999-012-2347-Y
Donald S. Garbuz, Michael Tanzer, Nelson V. Greidanus, Bassam A. Masri, Clive P. Duncan, The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing versus Large-diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 468, pp. 318- 325 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11999-009-1029-X