Assessing the Differences in Bitcoin & Other Cryptocurrency Legality Across National Jurisdictions

作者: Usman W. Chohan

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3042248

关键词:

摘要: The growth of cryptocurrencies has been met with a variety regulatory and legislative responses across national jurisdictions, some signalling approval the general transactional functional aspects cryptocurrencies, while other responding prohibitions or restrictions. This diversity response signals on one hand perplexity authorities as to full possibilities realization inadequate oversight governance role those would have in disintermediated nature cryptocurrency transactions. discussion paper assesses differences Bitcoin legality jurisdictions.

参考文章(49)
Cameron Harwick, Cryptocurrency and the Problem of Intermediation Social Science Research Network. ,(2015) , 10.2139/SSRN.2523771
Ferdinando M. Ametrano, Hayek Money: The Cryptocurrency Price Stability Solution Social Science Research Network. ,(2016) , 10.2139/SSRN.2425270
David Graeber, Debt: The First 5000 Years ,(2011)
Stephen T. Middlebrook, Sarah Jane Hughes, Advancing a Framework for Regulating Cryptocurrency Payments Intermediaries Social Science Research Network. ,(2015)
Mitsuru Iwamura, Yukinobu Kitamura, Tsutomu Matsumoto, Kenji Saito, Can We Stabilize the Price of a Cryptocurrency?: Understanding the Design of Bitcoin and Its Potential to Compete with Central Bank Money Social Science Research Network. ,(2014) , 10.2139/SSRN.2519367
Ed Howden, The Crypto-Currency Conundrum: Regulating an Uncertain Future Social Science Research Network. ,(2015)
Edward Felten, Andrew Miller, Arvind Narayanan, Joseph Bonneau, Steven Goldfeder, Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction ,(2016)