Evaluating the outcomes of collaborative wildlife governance: The role of social-ecological system context and collaboration dynamics

作者: S. Dressel , G. Ericsson , M. Johansson , C. Kalén , S.E. Pfeffer

DOI: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2020.105028

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The acknowledgement of uncertainty and complexity in social-ecological systems has increased the implementation collaborative governance regimes for environmental issues. performance these new to deliver favourable social ecological outcomes must therefore be evaluated. We focus on case Swedish wildlife governance, which a tradition using elements. In relation moose (Alces alces), aspects were recently formalized an amended policy. aim assess some this regime’s with respect intermediate (i.e. quota fulfilment). use path analysis test causal effects system context collaboration dynamics outcomes. Collaboration assessed web-based survey sent all stakeholders Moose Management Groups (response rate = 82 %). Our originally specified model yielded good fit (SRMR .030 robust TLI .996) explained 20 % variation Context variables revealed significant direct Larger Areas fluctuations forage availability required more time investment from actors, while high land diversity density other ungulate species negatively affected fulfilment. that invested perceived have knowledge base achieved better thus had positive effect From policy perspective, our results raise questions regarding institutional because factors negative process.

参考文章(73)
Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi, Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix Public Performance & Management Review. ,vol. 38, pp. 717- 747 ,(2015) , 10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
Tyler Scott, Does Collaboration Make Any Difference? Linking Collaborative Governance to Environmental Outcomes Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. ,vol. 34, pp. 537- 566 ,(2015) , 10.1002/PAM.21836
Yves Rosseel, lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 48, pp. 1- 36 ,(2012) , 10.18637/JSS.V048.I02
Camilla Sandström, Sofia Wennberg Di Gasper, Karin Öhman, Conflict resolution through ecosystem-based management: the case of Swedish moose management The International Journal of the Commons. ,vol. 7, pp. 549- 570 ,(2013) , 10.18352/IJC.349
Elinor Ostrom, Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework Policy Studies Journal. ,vol. 39, pp. 7- 27 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1541-0072.2010.00394.X
Mayumi Ueno, Erling J Solberg, Hayato Iijima, Christer M Rolandsen, Lars Erik Gangsei, None, Performance of hunting statistics as spatiotemporal density indices of moose (Alces alces) in Norway Ecosphere. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 20 ,(2014) , 10.1890/ES13-00083.1
François Lebel, Christian Dussault, Ariane Massé, Steeve D. Côté, Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white‐tailed deer harvest Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 76, pp. 1431- 1440 ,(2012) , 10.1002/JWMG.377
C. Ansell, A. Gash, Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. ,vol. 18, pp. 543- 571 ,(2007) , 10.1093/JOPART/MUM032