Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation

作者: Roberto Matorras , Alvaro Gorostiaga , Javier Diez , Beatriz Corcóstegui , Jose Ignacio Pijoan

DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58165-5

关键词:

摘要: Objective To compare the efficacy of IUI donor and pericervical insemination in frozen sperm cycles under gonadotropin stimulation. Design Couples where infertility was caused by male conditions were randomized into two groups: insemination. Semen samples, stimulation, ovarian monitoring same both groups. One performed per cycle as against inseminations. Setting The program at Human Reproduction Unit Hospital Cruces, Pais Vasco University. Patients Eighty-eight women (47 41 insemination) with least one patent fallopian tube Main Outcome Measure Intrauterine gestational sac observed transvaginal ultrasound. Results Per woman pregnancy rate (PR) higher than (65.96% versus 41.46%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.73, confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 7.2). Pregnancy rates always irrespective husband's status, but statistical significance not reached any subgroups analyzed independently. PR also significantly insemination: 24.03% (31/129) 11.89% (17/143) (OR 2.34, CI=1.17 4.71). Moreover, cumulative (86% 49.5%) 6, CI=1.98 18.80). Conclusion PRs IUI.

参考文章(23)
G.M. Centola, J.H. Mattox, R.F. Raubertas, Pregnancy rates after double versus single insemination with frozen donor semen International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. ,vol. 36, pp. 1089- 1092 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0020-7292(91)90790-C
Phillip E. Patton, Kenneth A. Burry, Amy Thurmond, Miles J. Novy, Don P. Wolf, Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 57, pp. 559- 564 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54900-0
Janelle Odom, Gary Ackerman, William Byrd, Karen Bradshaw, Bruce Carr, Clare Edman, A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 53, pp. 521- 527 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53351-2
Daniel W. Cramer, Alexander M. Walker, Isaac Schiff, Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 32, pp. 80- 86 ,(1979) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44120-8
Leslee L. Subak, G. David Adamson, Nancy L. Boltz, Therapeutic donor insemination: A prospective randomized trial of fresh versus frozen sperm American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 166, pp. 1597- 1606 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91548-O
W. J. Holmgren, R. S. Jeyendran, M. R. Neff, M. Perez-Pelaez, L. J. D. Zaneveld, Preincubation of human spermatozoa in test-yolk medium: effect on penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes and correlation with other semen characteristics. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. ,vol. 6, pp. 207- 212 ,(1989) , 10.1007/BF01132866
A. R. Martinez, R. E. Bernardus, J. P. W. Vermeiden, J. Schoemaker, Basic questions on intrauterine insemination: an update. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. ,vol. 48, pp. 811- 828 ,(1993) , 10.1097/00006254-199312000-00007
Roberto Matorras, Beatriz Corcóstegui, Carlos Perez, Maria Mandiola, Rosario Mendoza, Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Escudero, Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband’s sperm Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 63, pp. 608- 611 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57434-2
Ronald L. Urry, Richard G. Middleton, Kirtly Jones, Marsh Poulson, Richard Worley, William Keye, Artificial insemination: a comparison of pregnancy rates with intrauterine versus cervical insemination and washed sperm versus serum swim-up sperm preparations. Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 49, pp. 1036- 1038 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59957-9