Presentation of treatment effect in glioblastoma after dose-escalation radiation therapy.

作者: Danielle Cicka , Charles Lester Ford , Erica Templin , Zachary Pitts , Saumya Gurbani

DOI: 10.1093/OMCR/OMZ085

关键词:

摘要: Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Limited treatment options and intense nature of therapy make determining appropriate course for each patient difficult. The appearance transient worsening imaging findings, known as effect, after chemoradiation further complicates clinical decision-making. Accurately differentiating effects from true progression critical subsequent decisions are based largely on radiographic evidence progression. As can cause it possible that use new treatments modified regimens may alter presentation effect. Therefore, physicians should be aware atypical presentations occur, more likely, when modified. Here, we present case a with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wild type, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-methylated glioblastoma who underwent dose-escalation radiation (to 75 Gy) exhibited worsened findings at 8 months post-radiation.

参考文章(10)
Matthew Koshy, John L. Villano, Therese A. Dolecek, Andrew Howard, Usama Mahmood, Steven J. Chmura, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Bridget J. McCarthy, Improved survival time trends for glioblastoma using the SEER 17 population-based registries Journal of Neuro-oncology. ,vol. 107, pp. 207- 212 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11060-011-0738-7
Kashif Parvez, Aatif Parvez, Gelareh Zadeh, The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pseudoprogression, Radiation Necrosis and Brain Tumor Recurrence International Journal of Molecular Sciences. ,vol. 15, pp. 11832- 11846 ,(2014) , 10.3390/IJMS150711832
Jeremy D. Ruben, Michael Dally, Michael Bailey, Robin Smith, Catriona A. McLean, Pasqual Fedele, Cerebral radiation necrosis: incidence, outcomes, and risk factors with emphasis on radiation parameters and chemotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 65, pp. 499- 508 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2005.12.002
Jennifer L. Clarke, Susan Chang, Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: challenges in brain tumor imaging. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. ,vol. 9, pp. 241- 246 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11910-009-0035-4
Roger Stupp, Warren P. Mason, Martin J. van den Bent, Michael Weller, Barbara Fisher, Martin J.B. Taphoorn, Karl Belanger, Alba A. Brandes, Christine Marosi, Ulrich Bogdahn, Jürgen Curschmann, Robert C. Janzer, Samuel K. Ludwin, Thierry Gorlia, Anouk Allgeier, Denis Lacombe, J. Gregory Cairncross, Elizabeth Eisenhauer, René O. Mirimanoff, Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 352, pp. 987- 996 ,(2005) , 10.1056/NEJMOA043330
Alba A Brandes, Enrico Franceschi, Alicia Tosoni, Valeria Blatt, Annalisa Pession, Giovanni Tallini, Roberta Bertorelle, Stefania Bartolini, Fabio Calbucci, Alvaro Andreoli, Giampiero Frezza, Marco Leonardi, Federica Spagnolli, Mario Ermani, None, MGMTPromoter Methylation Status Can Predict the Incidence and Outcome of Pseudoprogression After Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 26, pp. 2192- 2197 ,(2008) , 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8163
Jigisha P. Thakkar, Therese A. Dolecek, Craig Horbinski, Quinn T. Ostrom, Donita D. Lightner, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, John L. Villano, Epidemiologic and Molecular Prognostic Review of Glioblastoma Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 23, pp. 1985- 1996 ,(2014) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275
Joo Yeon Nam, John F. de Groot, Treatment of Glioblastoma Journal of Oncology Practice. ,vol. 13, pp. 629- 638 ,(2017) , 10.1200/JOP.2017.025536
Rodney E. Wegner, Stephen Abel, Zachary D. Horne, Shaakir Hasan, Vivek Verma, Tulika Ranjan, Richard W. Williamson, Stephen M. Karlovits, National trends in radiation dose escalation for glioblastoma. Radiation oncology journal. ,vol. 37, pp. 13- 21 ,(2019) , 10.3857/ROJ.2019.00017