Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians A Systematic Review

作者: Jonathan B. VanGeest , Timothy P. Johnson , Verna L. Welch

DOI: 10.1177/0163278707307899

关键词:

摘要: Although physician surveys are an important tool in health services and policy research, they often characterized by low response rates. The authors conducted a systematic review of 66 published reports efforts to improve rates surveys. Two general strategies were explored this literature: incentive design-based approaches. Even small financial incentives found be effective improving response. Token nonmonetary much less effective. In terms design strategies, postal telephone have generally been more successful than fax or Web-based approaches, with evidence also supporting use mixed-mode population. addition, first-class stamps on return envelopes questionnaires designed brief, personalized, endorsed legitimizing professional associations likely successful. Researchers should continue implement that documented the survey physicians.

参考文章(103)
Auricchio Rj, Potyk D, Watson P, Benson J, Palpant S, Novan G, Use of a non-monetary incentive to improve physician responses to a mail survey. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 73- 74 ,(1997)
Melina Gattellari, Jeanette E Ward, Will donations to their learned college increase surgeons' participation in surveys? A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 54, pp. 645- 649 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00350-4
Emil H. Schemitsch, Paul Tornetta, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari, Marc F. Swiontkowski, Pam Leece, Does flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons. Canadian Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 49, pp. 90- 95 ,(2006)
Rachel A Nakash, Jane L Hutton, Ellen C Jørstad-Stein, Simon Gates, Sarah E Lamb, Maximising response to postal questionnaires – A systematic review of randomised trials in health research BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 6, pp. 5- 5 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5
Kirstie McKenzie-McHarg, Lucy Tully, Simon Gates, Sarah Ayers, Peter Brocklehurst, Effect on survey response rate of hand written versus printed signature on a covering letter: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN67566265] BMC Health Services Research. ,vol. 5, pp. 52- 52 ,(2005) , 10.1186/1472-6963-5-52
S Kellerman, Physician response to surveys. a review of the literature American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 61- 67 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00258-0
Lucy Savitz, TR Konrad, SM Cummings, Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Services Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 1347- 1355 ,(2001)
Elizabeth G. VanDen Kerkhof, Joel L. Parlow, David H. Goldstein, Brian Milne, In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie. ,vol. 51, pp. 449- 454 ,(2004) , 10.1007/BF03018307
Ann Deehan, Colin Drummond, Colin Taylor, John Strang, Lorna Templeton, The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 47, pp. 87- 90 ,(1997)